Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22646658›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

Limitations of the rhesus macaque draft genome assembly and annotation.

Xiongfei Zhang, Joel Goodsell, Robert B Norgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Divergent sensory and immune gene evolution in sea turtles with contrasting demographic and life histories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. MicroRNA Signatures of the Developing Primate Fovea.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reconstruction and evolutionary history of eutherian chromosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Unraveling the message: insights into comparative genomics of the naked mole-rat.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiongfei ZhangDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Joel Goodsell
Robert B Norgren

Funding

Gene-Targeted SNP discovery in rhesus macaquesR24RR017444 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI NORGREN, ROBERT B. · 2003 to 2011
$5.2M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR017444NCRR NIH HHS RR017444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finished genome sequences and assemblies are available for only a few vertebrates. Thus, investigators studying many species must rely on draft genomes. Using the rhesus macaque as an example, we document the effects of sequencing errors, gaps in sequence and misassemblies on one automated gene model pipeline, Gnomon. The combination of draft genome with automated gene finding software can result in spurious sequences. We estimate that approximately 50% of the rhesus gene models are missing, incomplete or incorrect. The problems identified in this work likely apply to all draft vertebrate genomes annotated with any automated gene model pipeline and thus represent a pervasive challenge to the analysis of draft genomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceChromosomes, MammalianCodon, NonsenseExonsFrameshift MutationGene DuplicationGenomeMacaca mulattaMolecular Sequence AnnotationMutagenesis, InsertionalCodon, Nonsense

Identifiers

PMID22646658
PMCPMC3426473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.