ArticleInternational journal of speech-language pathology2012
Studying the impact of intensity is important but complicated.
Article in International journal of speech-language pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03972891 (Influence of a Intervention Break on a Treated Phonological Process in Spontaneous Speech Situations in Children Aged 5 to 6 Years With Phonologically Delayed Development), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Influence of a Intervention Break on a Treated Phonological Process in Spontaneous Speech Situations in Children Aged 5 to 6 Years With Phonologically Delayed Development
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of voice therapy in patients with vocal fold nodules: a systematic search and narrative review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Effects of dose frequency of early communication intervention in young children with and without Down syndrome.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2014Trial
- Genres and typologies of standard paediatric service public funding model provisions for speech-language pathology management: A scoping review.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Maximizing Treatment Efficiency in Developmental Language Disorder: Positive Effects in Half the Time.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2019Article
- Consequential differences in perspectives and practices concerning children with developmental language disorders: an integrative review.International journal of language & communication disorders · 2019Review
- Targeting Complex Sentences in Older School Children With Specific Language Impairment: Results From an Early-Phase Treatment Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This commentary suggests that the most commonly studied aspect intensity (dose frequency) on overall rate of response to treatment may often be weak or conditional. To improve statistical power of tests of weak effects additive statistical models have typically been used. However, multiplicative models may be a more productive route to understanding dose frequency effects on children's speech and language development. To illustrate, recent findings are presented that dose frequency effects on vocabulary development varied by two child characteristics. Finally, it is suggested that spacing of teaching episodes within an intervention session be included as a variable in the multi-dimensional model of treatment intensity. Spacing teaching episodes may eventually prove to be one of the more powerful aspects of intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.