ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2012
Computational challenges and human factors influencing the design and use of clinical research participant eligibility pre-screening tools.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review on natural language processing systems for eligibility prescreening in clinical research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
- Employing computers for the recruitment into clinical trials: a comprehensive systematic review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Pooled it
- Suicide Prevention RCT Pilot: Rural Veterans Receiving Mental Health Community Care.Rural mental health · 2026Article
- Sociotechnical feasibility of natural language processing-driven tools in clinical trial eligibility prescreening for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Clinical research staff perceptions on a natural language processing-driven tool for eligibility prescreening: An iterative usability assessment.International journal of medical informatics · 2023Article
- Validation of a sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire for athletes in the United Kingdom and Ireland.Journal of nutritional science · 2023Article
- Using passive extraction of real-world data from eConsent, electronic patient reported outcomes (ePRO) and electronic health record (EHR) data loaded to an electronic data capture (EDC) system for a multi-center, prospective, observational study in diabetic patients.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- ELaPro, a LOINC-mapped core dataset for top laboratory procedures of eligibility screening for clinical trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Shared-Task Worklists Improve Clinical Trial Recruitment Workflow in an Academic Emergency Department.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map.Trials · 2020Review
- A Real-Time Automated Patient Screening System for Clinical Trials Eligibility in an Emergency Department: Design and Evaluation.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
- Usability evaluation of obstetrics and gynecology information system using cognitive walkthrough method.Electronic physician · 2018Article
- Review and evaluation of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithm authoring tools for clinical and translational research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Review
- Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- Automated clinical trial eligibility prescreening: increasing the efficiency of patient identification for clinical trials in the emergency department.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- User Satisfaction Evaluation of the EHR4CR Query Builder: A Multisite Patient Count Cohort System.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Advancing the microbiome research community.Cell · 2014Article
- Usability evaluation of Laboratory and Radiology Information Systems integrated into a hospital information system.Journal of medical systems · 2014Article
- Trial prospector: matching patients with cancer research studies using an automated and scalable approach.Cancer informatics · 2014Article
- Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national research register to enable 'direct to patient' enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE).BMC health services research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical trials are the primary mechanism for advancing clinical care and evidenced-based practice, yet challenges with the recruitment of participants for such trials are widely recognized as a major barrier to these types of studies. Data warehouses (DW) store large amounts of heterogenous clinical data that can be used to enhance recruitment practices, but multiple challenges exist when using a data warehouse for such activities, due to the manner of collection, management, integration, analysis, and dissemination of the data. A critical step in leveraging the DW for recruitment purposes is being able to match trial eligibility criteria to discrete and semi-structured data types in the data warehouse, though trial eligibility criteria tend to be written without concern for their computability. We present the multi-modal evaluation of a web-based tool that can be used for pre-screening patients for clinical trial eligibility and assess the ability of this tool to be practically used for clinical research pre-screening and recruitment.
methodsThe study used a validation study, usability testing, and a heuristic evaluation to evaluate and characterize the operational characteristics of the software as well as human factors affecting its use.
resultsClinical trials from the Division of Cardiology and the Department of Family Medicine were used for this multi-modal evaluation, which included a validation study, usability study, and a heuristic evaluation. From the results of the validation study, the software demonstrated a positive predictive value (PPV) of 54.12% and 0.7%, respectively, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 73.3% and 87.5%, respectively, for two types of clinical trials. Heuristic principles concerning error prevention and documentation were characterized as the major usability issues during the heuristic evaluation.
conclusionsThis software is intended to provide an initial list of eligible patients to a clinical study coordinators, which provides a starting point for further eligibility screening by the coordinator. Because this software has a high "rule in" ability, meaning that it is able to remove patients who are not eligible for the study, the use of an automated tool built to leverage an existing enterprise DW can be beneficial to determining eligibility and facilitating clinical trial recruitment through pre-screening. While the results of this study are promising, further refinement and study of this and related approaches to automated eligibility screening, including comparison to other approaches and stakeholder perceptions, are needed and future studies are planned to address these needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.