Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22646308›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2012

Sequence analysis for detection of first-line drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from a high-incidence setting.

Silke Feuerriegel, Barbara Oberhauser, Abu Garawani George, Foday Dafae, Elvira Richter, Sabine Rüsch-Gerdes, Stefan Niemann

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distribution ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Should treatment of low-level rifampicin mono-resistant tuberculosis be different?Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021
    Article
  11. Frequency of Codon 306 Mutations inInternational journal of preventive medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The roles ofInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silke FeuerriegelMolecular Mycobacteriology, Research Center Borstel, Germany. sfeuerriegel@fz-borstel.de
Barbara Oberhauser
Abu Garawani George
Foday Dafae
Elvira Richter
Sabine Rüsch-Gerdes
Stefan Niemann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug resistance displays a problem for the therapy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections. For molecular resistance testing, it is essential to have precise knowledge on genomic variations involved in resistance development. However, data from high-incidence settings are only sparely available. Therefore we performed a systematic approach and analyzed a total of 97 M. tuberculosis strains from previously treated patients in Sierra Leone for mutations in katG, rpoB, rrs, rpsL, gidB, embB, pncA and where applicable in inhA and ahpC. Of the strains investigated 50 were either mono- or poly-resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, streptomycin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide or MDR and 47 fully susceptible strains served as controls.

resultsThe majority of isoniazid and rifampin resistant strains had mutations in katG315 (71.9%) and rpoB531 (50%). However, rpoB mutations in codons 511, 516 and 533 were also detected in five rifampin susceptible strains. MIC determinations revealed low-level rifampin resistance for those strains. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of sequencing of katG for detection of drug resistance were 86.7% and 100% and for sequencing of rpoB 100% and 93.8%, respectively.Strikingly, none of the streptomycin resistant strains had mutations in rrs, but 47.5% harboured mutations in rpsL. Further changes were detected in gidB. Among ethambutol resistant strains 46.7% had mutations at embB306. Pyrazinamide resistant strains displayed a variety of mutations throughout pncA. The specificities of sequencing of rpsL, embB and pncA for resistance detection were high (96-100%), whereas sensitivities were lower (48.8%, 73.3%, 70%).

conclusionsOur study reveals a good correlation between data from molecular and phenotypic resistance testing in this high-incidence setting. However, the fact that particular mutations in rpoB are not linked to high-level resistance is challenging and demonstrates that careful interpretation of molecular resistance assays is mandatory. In addition, certain variations, especially in gidB, appear to be phylogenetically informative polymorphisms rather than markers for drug resistance.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialGenotypeHumansIncidenceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNASierra LeoneTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID22646308
PMCPMC3404943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.