ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2012
The impact of bevacizumab on temozolomide concentrations in intracranial U87 gliomas.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased Antiangiogenic Effect by Blocking CCL2-dependent Macrophages in a Rodent Glioblastoma Model: Correlation Study with Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Drug Screening of Human GBM Spheroids in Brain Cancer Chip.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Intra-arterial administration improves temozolomide delivery and efficacy in a model of intracerebral metastasis, but has unexpected brain toxicity.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Article
- Article
- Combination of anti-VEGF therapy and temozolomide in two experimental human glioma models.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2014Article
- Glioma and glioblastoma - how much do we (not) know?Molecular and clinical oncology · 2013Review
- Microdialysis measurement of intratumoral temozolomide concentration after cediranib, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in a U87 glioma model.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAn important question in the sequencing of anti-cancer therapies in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is whether concurrent anti-angiogenesis therapies improve or impair brain concentrations of concomitantly administered cytotoxic therapies. The purpose of this study is to assess the intratumoral disposition of temozolomide (TMZ) via microdialysis before and after bevacizumab in an intracranial GBM xenograft model.
methodsMicrodialysis probes were placed within tumor and contralateral brain in athymic rats bearing U87 intracerebral gliomas. TMZ (50 mg/kg oral) was administered 10 days thereafter. Extracellular fluid (ECF) was collected for 6 h. BEV was administered (10 mg/kg IV), and TMZ was re-dosed (50 mg/kg oral) 36 h thereafter with additional ECF collection. All ECF samples were assessed for TMZ concentration with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
resultsTumor TMZ mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-∞)) was 3.35 μg h/mL pre-BEV. Post-BEV, tumor mean TMZ AUC(0-∞) was 3.98 μg h/mL. In non-tumor brain, mean TMZ AUC(0-∞) pre-BEV was 3.22 μg h/mL and post-BEV was 3.34 μg h/mL.
conclusionsThere were no statistically significant changes in TMZ pharmacokinetics before or after BEV in the athymic rat U87 intracranial glioma model. BEV and TMZ are being investigated as a combination therapy in several ongoing studies for patients with glioma. These data reassuringly suggest that BEV does not significantly change the ECF tumor concentrations of TMZ in either tumor-bearing or normal brain when dosed 36 h prior to TMZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.