Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22644738›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2012

Unidentified genetic variants influence pancreatic cancer risk: an analysis of polygenic susceptibility in the PanScan study.

Brandon L Pierce, Lin Tong, Peter Kraft, Habibul Ahsan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Do Polygenic Risk Scores Add to Clinical Data in Predicting Pancreatic Cancer? A Scoping Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon L PierceDepartment of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. bpierce@health.bsd.uchicago.edu
Lin Tong
Peter Kraft
Habibul Ahsan
University of Chicago · USCancer Research Center · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Genomewide association in early-onset breast cancerU01CA122171 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI AHSAN, HABIBUL · 2006 to 2010
$7.2M
Genetic Susceptibility to Arsenic-induced Skin CancerR01CA102484 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI AHSAN, HABIBUL · 2004 to 2008
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA102484NCI NIH HHS CA122171NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102484NCI NIH HHS U01 CA122171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified several pancreatic cancer (PanCa) susceptibility loci. Methods for assessment of polygenic susceptibility can be employed to detect the collective effect of additional association signals for PanCa. Using data on 492,651 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the PanScan GWA study (2,857 cases, 2,967 controls), we employed polygenic risk score (PRS) cross-validation (CV) methods to (a) confirm the existence of unidentified association signals, (b) assess the predictive value of PRSs, and (c) assess evidence for polygenic effects in specific genomic locations (genic vs. intergenic). After excluding SNPs in known PanCa susceptibility regions, we constructed PRS models using a training GWA dataset and then tested the model in an independent testing dataset using fourfold CV. We also employed a "power-replication" approach, where power to detect SNP associations was calculated using a training dataset, and power was tested for association with "replication status" in a testing dataset. PRS scores constructed using ≥ 10% of genome-wide SNPs showed significant association with PanCa (P< 0.05) across the majority of CV analyses. Associations were stronger for PRSs restricted to genic SNPs compared to intergenic PRSs. The power-replications approach produced weaker associations that were not significant when restricting to SNPs with low pairwise linkage disequilibrium, whereas PRS results were robust to such restrictions. Although the PRS approach will not dramatically improve PanCa prediction, it provides strong evidence for unidentified association signals for PanCa. Our results suggest that focusing association studies on genic regions and conducting larger GWA studies can reveal additional PanCa susceptibility loci.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyAlgorithmsAllelesCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansMaleModels, GeneticPancreatic NeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk

Identifiers

PMID22644738
PMCPMC10967700
OpenAlexW1953279209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.