Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22644379›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2012

Smad4 disruption accelerates keratinocyte reepithelialization in murine cutaneous wound repair.

Leilei Yang, Wenlong Li, Shaoxia Wang, Lijuan Wang, Yang Li, Xiao Yang, Ruiyun Peng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cancer Stem Cells in Squamous Cell Carcinoma.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2017
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Leilei YangBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, 27 Tai-Ping Road, Beijing 100850, People's Republic of China.
Wenlong Li
Shaoxia Wang
Lijuan Wang
Yang Li
Xiao Yang
Ruiyun Peng
Beijing Radiation Center · CNBeijing Proteome Research Center · CNCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biotechnology · CZInstitute of Animal Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratinocyte reepithelialization is a rate-limiting event in cutaneous wound repair, which involves the migration and proliferation of keratinocytes to cover the denuded dermal surface. Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) has the ability to induce epithelial cell migration while inhibiting proliferation, and controversial results have been generated regarding the effect of TGF-β signaling on reepithelialization. In this study, full-thickness skin wounds were made in keratinocyte-specific Smad4 knockout and the control mice. The wound closure, reepithelialization, keratinocyte proliferation, myofibroblast numbers and collagen deposition of were assessed. The results showed that the proliferation of keratinocytes increased, which accelerated the reepithelialization, and led to faster wound repair in the epidermis of Smad4 mutant mice. Upregulation of keratin 17, 14-3-3 sigma and phosphorylated AKT in the hyperproliferative epidermis may be correlated with the accelerated reepithelialization. We conclude that Smad4 plays an inhibitory role in the keratinocyte-mediated reepithelialization of wound healing.

Indexed as

14-3-3 ProteinsAnimalsBlotting, WesternCell CountCell ProliferationEpithelial CellsGenotypeKeratin-17KeratinocytesMiceMice, KnockoutMyofibroblastsSkinSmad4 ProteinUp-RegulationWound Healing14-3-3 ProteinsKeratin-17Sfn protein, mouseSmad4 ProteinSmad4 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22644379
OpenAlexW2090999292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.