ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2012
Menopausal hormone therapy and risks of colorectal adenomas and cancers in the French E3N prospective cohort: true associations or bias?
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medication use and risk of proximal colon cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies with narrative synthesis and meta-analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2021Pooled it
- [Perimenopause and postmenopause: acute diagnostic and therapeutic aspects for the DACH region : Consensus paper of the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG), the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the German Menopause Society (DMG) and the Swiss Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Menopause, hysterectomy, menopausal hormone therapy and cause-specific mortality: cohort study of UK Biobank participants.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Estrogen Receptor Beta: The Promising Biomarker and Potential Target in Metastases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Cetuximab versus bevacizumab maintenance following prior 8-cycle modified FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab in Asian postmenopausal women with treatment-naive KRAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Article
- The influence of hormone therapies on colon and rectal cancer.European journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
- The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.European journal of epidemiology · 2013Article
- Molecular pathways: Estrogen pathway in colorectal cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use has been quite consistently associated with a decreased colorectal cancer risk; however, data regarding adenomas, types of MHT, or tumour site are limited. We investigated associations between MHT use and colorectal adenoma and cancer risks within the prospective E3N cohort study. In the adenoma study, we analyzed the 13,402 postmenopausal women who underwent a colonoscopy during follow-up (1993-2002), including 1,109 who were diagnosed a first colorectal adenoma. In the cancer study, 525 out of 77,375 postmenopausal women developed a colorectal cancer as the first malignant tumour during follow-up (1992-2008). Ever use of MHT was not significantly associated with colorectal adenoma risk [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.13, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.99, 1.29], nor with colorectal cancer risk (HR = 0.86, 95 % CI = 0.71, 1.04). However, ever use of estrogens alone was associated with risks of colorectal adenoma and cancer in opposite directions (HR = 1.22, 95 % CI = 1.05, 1.41 and HR = 0.72, 95 % CI = 0.56, 0.94 respectively). Associations were strongest for non-advanced, and for left colon adenomas. Duration, recency of use, type of progestagen or route of estrogen administration were not associated with colorectal tumour risk, nor was the use of estrogen-progestagen MHT. The association between estrogens alone and colorectal cancer risk was only observed in women with previous colonoscopy(ies), but the P value of the interaction test between estrogens alone use and history of colonoscopy was 0.06. Our data suggest a complex relationship between MHT use, colorectal tumour risk and screening strategies, which deserves further investigations in other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.