Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22644109›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2012

Menopausal hormone therapy and risks of colorectal adenomas and cancers in the French E3N prospective cohort: true associations or bias?

Sophie Morois, Agnès Fournier, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Sylvie Mesrine, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.European journal of epidemiology · 2013
    Article
  9. Molecular pathways: Estrogen pathway in colorectal cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie MoroisINSERM, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, UMRS 1018, Team 9, Institut Gustave Roussy, Espace Maurice Tubiana, 94805 Villejuif, Cedex, France.
Agnès Fournier
Françoise Clavel-Chapelon
Sylvie Mesrine
Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use has been quite consistently associated with a decreased colorectal cancer risk; however, data regarding adenomas, types of MHT, or tumour site are limited. We investigated associations between MHT use and colorectal adenoma and cancer risks within the prospective E3N cohort study. In the adenoma study, we analyzed the 13,402 postmenopausal women who underwent a colonoscopy during follow-up (1993-2002), including 1,109 who were diagnosed a first colorectal adenoma. In the cancer study, 525 out of 77,375 postmenopausal women developed a colorectal cancer as the first malignant tumour during follow-up (1992-2008). Ever use of MHT was not significantly associated with colorectal adenoma risk [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.13, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.99, 1.29], nor with colorectal cancer risk (HR = 0.86, 95 % CI = 0.71, 1.04). However, ever use of estrogens alone was associated with risks of colorectal adenoma and cancer in opposite directions (HR = 1.22, 95 % CI = 1.05, 1.41 and HR = 0.72, 95 % CI = 0.56, 0.94 respectively). Associations were strongest for non-advanced, and for left colon adenomas. Duration, recency of use, type of progestagen or route of estrogen administration were not associated with colorectal tumour risk, nor was the use of estrogen-progestagen MHT. The association between estrogens alone and colorectal cancer risk was only observed in women with previous colonoscopy(ies), but the P value of the interaction test between estrogens alone use and history of colonoscopy was 0.06. Our data suggest a complex relationship between MHT use, colorectal tumour risk and screening strategies, which deserves further investigations in other settings.

Indexed as

MenopauseAdenomaAdultAgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Administration RoutesEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleFranceHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22644109
OpenAlexW2006862601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.