Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22644020›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Efficacy of LFF571 in a hamster model of Clostridium difficile infection.

Anna Trzasko, Jennifer A Leeds, Jens Praestgaard, Matthew J Lamarche, David McKenney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. In Vitro and In Vivo Anti-Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  8. Alteration of Intestinal Microbiome ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Bacteriocins From LAB and Other Alternative Approaches for the Control ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  12. Thiostrepton: A Novel Therapeutic Drug Candidate forMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  13. Management of adult Clostridium difficile digestive contaminations: a literature review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Novel Antimicrobials for the Treatment ofFrontiers in medicine · 2018
    Review
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  18. Elucidating and engineering thiopeptide biosynthesis.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna TrzaskoNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Infectious Disease Area, Emeryville, California, USA.
Jennifer A Leeds
Jens Praestgaard
Matthew J Lamarche
David McKenney
Novartis (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LFF571 is a novel semisynthetic thiopeptide antibiotic with potent activity against a variety of Gram-positive pathogens, including Clostridium difficile. In vivo efficacy of LFF571 was compared to vancomycin in a hamster model of C. difficile infection (CDI). Infection was induced in Golden Syrian hamsters using a toxigenic strain of C. difficile. Treatment started 24 h postinfection and consisted of saline, vancomycin, or LFF571. Cox regression was used to analyze survival data from a cohort of animals evaluated across seven serial experimental groups treated with vancomycin at 20 mg/kg, LFF571 at 5 mg/kg, or vehicle alone. Survival was right censored; animals were not observed beyond day 21. At death or end of study, cecal contents were tested for C. difficile toxins A and B. In summary, the data showed that 5 mg/kg LFF571 decreased the risk of death by 79% (P < 0.0001) and 69% (P = 0.0022) compared with saline and 20 mg/kg vancomycin, respectively. Further analysis of the pooled data indicated that the survival benefit of LFF571 treatment at 5 mg/kg compared to vancomycin at 20 mg/kg was due primarily to a decrease in the risk of recurrence after end of treatment. Animals successfully treated with LFF571 or vancomycin had no detectable C. difficile toxin. Overall, LFF571 was more efficacious at the end of the study, at a lower dose, and with fewer recurrences, than vancomycin in the hamster model of CDI. LFF571 is being assessed in humans for safety and efficacy in the treatment of C. difficile infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileCricetinaeEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousEnterotoxinsMaleMesocricetusPeptides, CyclicRecurrenceThiazolesVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsEnterotoxinsLFF571Peptides, CyclictcdA protein, Clostridium difficileThiazolestoxB protein, Clostridium difficileVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID22644020
PMCPMC3421564
OpenAlexW2118304831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.