ArticleOncotarget2012
Dramatic reduction of sequence artefacts from DNA isolated from formalin-fixed cancer biopsies by treatment with uracil- DNA glycosylase.
Article in Oncotarget, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.
- Docetaxel plus cetuximab as second-line treatment for docetaxel-refractory oesophagogastric cancer: the AGITG ATTAX2 trial.British journal of cancer · 2013Trial
- Microbiome-Genome Crosstalk in Colorectal Cancer: Colibactin Signatures andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Tracking the Evolution of Cutaneous Melanoma by Multiparameter Flow Sorting and Genomic Profiling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Real-world data analysis for factors influencing the quality check status in FoundationOne CDx cancer genomic profiling tests.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial genome data provide insights into the phylogenetic relationships withinZooKeys · 2024Article
- A critical spotlight on the paradigms of FFPE-DNA sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2023Review
- Clinical significance of theOncology letters · 2023Article
- Standards for Quantitative Measurement of DNA Damage in Mammalian Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Comprehensive genetic screening for vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome through an amplification-based next-generation sequencing system.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2023Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Germline and SomaticAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Human papillomavirus-related neoplasia of the ocular adnexa.Acta ophthalmologica · 2022Article
- KRAS variant allele frequency, but not mutation positivity, associates with survival of patients with pancreatic cancer.Cancer science · 2022Article
- FFPE-Based NGS Approaches into Clinical Practice: The Limits of Glory from a Pathologist Viewpoint.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Profiling PI3K-AKT-MTOR variants in focal brain malformations reveals new insights for diagnostic care.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Preanalytical Variables and Sample Quality Control for Clinical Variant Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Ideafix: a decision tree-based method for the refinement of variants in FFPE DNA sequencing data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
- Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Samples for Next Generation Sequencing: Problems and Solutions.Genes · 2021Review
- Risk Reclassification of Patients with Endometrial Cancer Based on Tumor Molecular Profiling: First Real World Data.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-reproducible sequence artefacts are frequently detected in DNA from formalinfixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. However, no rational strategy has been developed for reduction of sequence artefacts from FFPE DNA as the underlying causes of the artefacts are poorly understood. As cytosine deamination to uracil is a common form of DNA damage in ancient DNA, we set out to examine whether treatment of FFPE DNA with uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) would lead to the reduction of C>T (and G>A) sequence artefacts. Heteroduplex formation in high resolution melting (HRM)-based assays was used for the detection of sequence variants in FFPE DNA samples. A set of samples that gave false positive HRM results for screening for the E17K mutation in exon 4 of the AKT1 gene were chosen for analysis. Sequencing of these samples showed multiple non-reproducible C:G>T:A artefacts. Treatment of the FFPE DNA with UDG prior to PCR amplification led to a very marked reduction of the sequence artefacts as indicated by both HRM and sequencing analysis, indicating that uracil lesions are the major cause of sequence artefacts. Similar results were shown for the BRAF V600 region in the same sample set and EGFR exon 19 in another sample set. UDG treatment specifically suppressed the formation of artefacts in FFPE DNA as it did not affect the detection of true KRAS codon 12 and true EGFR exon 19 and 20 mutations. We conclude that uracil in FFPE DNA leads to a significant proportion of sequence artefacts. These can be minimised by a simple UDG pretreatment which can be readily carried out, in the same tube, as the PCR immediately prior to commencing thermal cycling. HRM is a convenient way of monitoring both the degree of damage and the effectiveness of the UDG treatment. These findings have immediate and important implications for cancer diagnostics where FFPE DNA is used as the primary genetic material for mutational studies guiding personalised medicine strategies and where simple effective strategies to detect mutations are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.