Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22643829›Full record

ArticleInflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]2012

Use of blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, interleukin-6, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor in combination to predict the severity and outcome of abdominal sepsis in rats.

Min Gao, Lingli Zhang, Ying Liu, Mingshi Yang, Nian Wang, Kangkai Wang, Danmin Ou, Meidong Liu, Guangwen Chen, Ke Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.], 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Comparison of four scoring systems for predicting ICU mortality in patients with sepsis].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Protein kinase G oxidation is a major cause of injury during sepsis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Min GaoLaboratory of Shock, Department of Pathophysiology, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Lingli Zhang
Ying Liu
Mingshi Yang
Nian Wang
Kangkai Wang
Danmin Ou
Meidong Liu
Guangwen Chen
Ke Liu
Xianzhong Xiao
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccurate and timely diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis remain challenging. A combination of markers, as opposed to single ones, may improve the prognosis, and therefore survival. This study compared the effectiveness of routinely used biomarkers of sepsis alone and in combination for the prediction of outcome in rats with abdominal sepsis.

methodsRats were subjected to sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Seventeen biomarkers were detected 12 h after the CLP. Correlation between the biomarkers and outcome of rats was analyzed; the correlated biomarkers were analyzed by logistic regression analysis and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was computed to compare their performance in the prognosis of sepsis.

resultsA total of 49 rats were eligible for analysis. Body temperature (T), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatine kinase (CK), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels after the CLP were negatively correlated with the survival outcome, while platelet count (PLT), high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CCF) were positively correlated with the survival outcome (P < 0.05). Levels of BUN, Cr, IL-6, and GM-CSF after the CLP were independent predictors of outcome according to conditional logistic regression. The sensitivity and specificity of the four selected biomarkers in combination for predicting sepsis outcome were better than single ones (P < 0.05).

conclusionA combination of different biomarkers improves the diagnostic accuracy and is more effective in the prognosis of sepsis in rats. Use of BUN, Cr, IL-6, GM-CSF in combination to predict the severity and outcome in rats with abdominal sepsis exhibited acceptable diagnostic characteristics.

Indexed as

Blood Urea NitrogenAbdomenAlanine TransaminaseAnimalsBiomarkersChemokine CCL2Creatine KinaseCreatinineGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHMGB1 ProteinInterleukin-6MalePlatelet CountPrognosisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAlanine TransaminaseBiomarkersCcl2 protein, ratChemokine CCL2Creatine KinaseCreatinineGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHbp1 protein, ratHMGB1 ProteinInterleukin-6

Identifiers

PMID22643829
OpenAlexW2010437828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.