ArticleLab on a chip2012
Microfluidic droplet sorting with a high frequency ultrasound beam.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Droplet Generation and Manipulation in Microfluidics: A Comprehensive Overview of Passive and Active Strategies.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Droplet acoustofluidics: Recent progress and challenges.Biomicrofluidics · 2025Review
- FIDELITY: A quality control system for droplet microfluidics.Science advances · 2022Article
- Measurements of acoustic radiation force of ultrahigh frequency ultrasonic transducers using model-based approach.Applied physics letters · 2021Article
- Extremely High-Throughput Parallel Microfluidic Vortex-Actuated Cell Sorting.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Magnetic water-in-water droplet microfluidics: Systematic experiments and scaling mathematical analysis.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- Standing Surface Acoustic Wave (SSAW)-Based Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2018Article
- An on-chip imaging droplet-sorting system: a real-time shape recognition method to screen target cells in droplets with single cell resolution.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Biophysical Tools for Cellular and Subcellular Mechanical Actuation of Cell Signaling.Biophysical journal · 2016Review
- Ultrasonic scattering measurements of a live single cell at 86 MHz.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2015Article
- A high-throughput acoustic cell sorter.Lab on a chip · 2015Article
- A feasibility study ofApplied physics letters · 2014Article
- A microfluidic-based genetic screen to identify microbial virulence factors that inhibit dendritic cell migration.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2014Article
- An on-chip, multichannel droplet sorter using standing surface acoustic waves.Analytical chemistry · 2013Article
- Standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW) based multichannel cell sorting.Lab on a chip · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents experimental results demonstrating the feasibility of high frequency ultrasonic sensing and sorting for screening single oleic acid (lipid or oil) droplets under continuous flow in a microfluidic channel. In these experiments, hydrodynamically focused lipid droplets of two different diameters (50 μm and 100 μm) are centered along the middle of the channel, which is filled with deionized (DI) water. A 30 MHz lithium niobate (LiNbO(3)) transducer, placed outside the channel, first transmits short sensing pulses to non-invasively determine the acoustic scattering properties of the individual droplets passing through the beam's focus. Integrated backscatter (IB) coefficients, utilized as a sorting criterion, are measured by analyzing the received echo signals from each droplet. When the IB values corresponding to 100 μm droplets are obtained, a custom-built LabVIEW panel commands the transducer to emit sinusoidal burst signals to commence the sorting operation. The number of droplets tested for the sorting is 139 for 50 μm droplets and 95 for 100 μm droplets. The sensing efficiencies are estimated to be 98.6% and 99.0%, respectively. The sorting is carried out by applying acoustic radiation forces to 100 μm droplets to direct them towards the upper sheath flow, thus separating them from the centered droplet flow. The sorting efficiencies are 99.3% for 50 μm droplets and 85.3% for 100 μm droplets. The results suggest that this proposed technique has the potential to be further developed into a cost-effective and efficient cell/microparticle sorting instrument.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.