Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22643181›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2012

Best practice guidelines and recommendations on the molecular diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2.

Erik-Jan Kamsteeg, Wolfram Kress, Claudio Catalli, Jens M Hertz, Martina Witsch-Baumgartner, Michael F Buckley, Baziel G M van Engelen, Marianne Schwartz, Hans Scheffer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 testing, 2024 revision: A technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The novel (TCTG)Human genomics · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Local Non-Coding Regulatory Elements in Muscular Dystrophies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Myotonic dystrophies: an update on clinical features, molecular mechanisms, management, and gene therapy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Updated Structure ofNeurology. Genetics · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Erik-Jan KamsteegDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wolfram Kress
Claudio Catalli
Jens M Hertz
Martina Witsch-Baumgartner
Michael F Buckley
Baziel G M van Engelen
Marianne Schwartz
Hans Scheffer
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAarhus University Hospital · DKInnsbruck Medical University · ATRadboud University Medical Center · NLRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy is an autosomal dominant, multisystem disorder that is characterized by myotonic myopathy. The symptoms and severity of myotonic dystrophy type l (DM1) ranges from severe and congenital forms, which frequently result in death because of respiratory deficiency, through to late-onset baldness and cataract. In adult patients, cardiac conduction abnormalities may occur and cause a shorter life span. In subsequent generations, the symptoms in DM1 may present at an earlier age and have a more severe course (anticipation). In myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2), no anticipation is described, but cardiac conduction abnormalities as in DM1 are observed and patients with DM2 additionally have muscle pain and stiffness. Both DM1 and DM2 are caused by unstable DNA repeats in untranslated regions of different genes: A (CTG)n repeat in the 3'-UTR of the DMPK gene and a (CCTG)n repeat in intron 1 of the CNBP (formerly ZNF9) gene, respectively. The length of the (CTG)n repeat expansion in DM1 correlates with disease severity and age of onset. Nevertheless, these repeat sizes have limited predictive values on individual bases. Because of the disease characteristics in DM1 and DM2, appropriate molecular testing and reporting is very important for the optimal counseling in myotonic dystrophy. Here, we describe best practice guidelines for clinical molecular genetic analysis and reporting in DM1 and DM2, including presymptomatic and prenatal testing.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated RegionsFemaleGenetic TestingHumansIntronsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMyotonic DisordersMyotonic DystrophyMyotonin-Protein KinasePractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA-Binding ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNA3' Untranslated RegionsCNBP protein, humanDMPK protein, humanMyotonin-Protein KinaseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22643181
PMCPMC3499739
OpenAlexW1994095085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.