Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22642951›Full record

Trial reportClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2012

Robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection is effective in treating patients with early-stage gastric neoplasia.

Soo Jay Phee, Nageshwar Reddy, Philip W Y Chiu, Pradeep Rebala, Guduru V Rao, Zheng Wang, Zhenglong Sun, Jennie Y Y Wong, Khek-Yu Ho

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Current Status of Robotic Therapeutic Endoscopic Platforms].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Development of therapeutic digestive endoscopy robots: a narrative review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Review
  11. Robotics in interventional endoscopy-evolution and the way forward.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Flexible robotic endoscopy for treating gastrointestinal neoplasms.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Clinical adoption of robotics in endoscopy: Challenges and solutions.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Robotic endoscopy. A review of the literature.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Soo Jay PheeSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Nageshwar Reddy
Philip W Y Chiu
Pradeep Rebala
Guduru V Rao
Zheng Wang
Zhenglong Sun
Jennie Y Y Wong
Khek-Yu Ho
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology · INNanyang Technological University · SGNational University of Singapore · SGChinese University of Hong Kong · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a new technique for endoscopic resection of early-stage gastrointestinal cancers. Though ESD achieves high rate of en bloc resection, it is technically difficult to master. The development of a novel robotic endoscopic system that has 2 arms attached to an ordinary endoscope-Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER)-has improved the performance of complex endoluminal procedures. We evaluated the efficacy of MASTER-assisted ESD in treatment of patients with early-stage gastric neoplasia.

methodsWe performed a multicenter prospective study of 5 patients with early-stage gastric neoplasia, limited to the mucosa. After markings and circumferential mucosal incision, all submucosal dissections were performed using the MASTER system. We measured baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and perioperative and clinical outcomes.

resultsAll patients underwent successful MASTER-assisted ESD. The mean submucosal dissection time was 18.6 minutes (median, 16 minutes; range, 3-50 minutes). No perioperative complications were encountered. Three patients were discharged from the hospital within 12 hours and 2 on the third day after the procedures. Two patients were found to have intramucosal adenocarcinoma, 1 had high-grade dysplasia, 1 had low-grade dysplasia, and 1 had a hyperplastic polyp. The resection margins were clear of tumors in all 5 patients. No complications were observed at the 30-day follow-up examination. Follow-up endoscopic examinations revealed that none of the patients had residual or recurrent tumors.

conclusionsA flexible endoscopy robotic system can be used to perform ESD and effectively treat patients with early gastric neoplasia.

Indexed as

AdultAutomationEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRoboticsStomach NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22642951
OpenAlexW2109001722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.