Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22642906›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of pathology2012

A historical perspective on sepsis.

Peter A Ward, Markus Bosmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Tubeimoside I improves endothelial function in sepsis via activation of SIRT3.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2021
    Article
  4. HSP-Target of Therapeutic Agents in Sepsis Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter A WardDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5602, USA. pward@med.umich.edu
Markus Bosmann

Funding

Regulation of Lung Inflammation by Catecholamines and Adrenergic ReceptorsR01GM029507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WARD, PETER A · 1985 to 2013
$3.9M
Protective Effects of Anti-C5a in SepsisR01GM061656 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WARD, PETER A · 2002 to 2013
$3.8M
LUNG INJURY BY OXYGEN METABOLITESR37GM029507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WARD, PETER A · 1987 to 1996
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-29507NIGMS NIH HHS GM-61656NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM029507NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061656NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM029507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In North America, approximately 700,000 cases of sepsis occur each year, with mortality ranging between 30% and 50%. The American Journal of Pathology has featured numerous articles on the topic, revealing mechanistic insights gleaned from both experimental rodent models and human sepsis. Nonetheless, there remains urgent need to determine the basis for sepsis-related complications and how they can be avoided, as well as how they can be most effectively treated once recognized. This historical perspective reviews what we currently understand about the mechanisms of sepsis, as well as the barriers that remain in our treatment strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsB-LymphocytesClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalHumansRodentiaSepsisSpecies SpecificityT-LymphocytesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22642906
PMCPMC3388164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.