Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22642823›Full record

ArticleProteome science2012

Clinical proteomics and OMICS clues useful in translational medicine research.

Elena López, Luis Madero, Juan López-Pascual, Martin Latterich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteome science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A proteomic approach to obesity and type 2 diabetes.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Phosphoproteomics and lung cancer research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2012
    Review
  8. Functional phosphoproteomic mass spectrometry-based approaches.Clinical and translational medicine · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elena LópezCentro de Investigación i + 12, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Av, De Córdoba s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain. elena.lopez.villar@gmail.com.
Luis Madero
Juan López-Pascual
Martin Latterich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the advent of the new proteomics era more than a decade ago, large-scale studies of protein profiling have been used to identify distinctive molecular signatures in a wide array of biological systems, spanning areas of basic biological research, clinical diagnostics, and biomarker discovery directed toward therapeutic applications. Recent advances in protein separation and identification techniques have significantly improved proteomic approaches, leading to enhancement of the depth and breadth of proteome coverage.Proteomic signatures, specific for multiple diseases, including cancer and pre-invasive lesions, are emerging. This article combines, in a simple manner, relevant proteomic and OMICS clues used in the discovery and development of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers that are applicable to all clinical fields, thus helping to improve applications of clinical proteomic strategies for translational medicine research.

Identifiers

PMID22642823
PMCPMC3536680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.