Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22642356›Full record

Trial reportEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2012

Age-related differences in emotional reactivity, regulation, and rejection sensitivity in adolescence.

Jennifer A Silvers, Kateri McRae, John D E Gabrieli, James J Gross, Katherine A Remy, Kevin N Ochsner

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 200 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
200citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

200 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Perceived economic hardship and adjustment outcomes of children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

140 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer A SilversDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. jas2222@columbia.edu
Kateri McRae
John D E Gabrieli
James J Gross
Katherine A Remy
Kevin N Ochsner

Funding

The Development of Emotion Regulation Mechanisms Impacting HealthR01HD069178 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI OCHSNER, KEVIN N · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
The Neural Bases of the Cognitive Control of EmotionR01MH076137 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI OCHSNER, KEVIN N · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
Adolescent development of emotion regulation mechanismsF31MH094056 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SILVERS, JENNIFER ASHLEY · 2011 to 2012
$72k
NICHD NIH HHS HD069178NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069178NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH094056NIMH NIH HHS MH076137NIMH NIH HHS MH094056NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although adolescents' emotional lives are thought to be more turbulent than those of adults, it is unknown whether this difference is attributable to developmental changes in emotional reactivity or emotion regulation. Study 1 addressed this question by presenting healthy individuals aged 10-23 with negative and neutral pictures and asking them to respond naturally or use cognitive reappraisal to down-regulate their responses on a trial-by-trial basis. Results indicated that age exerted both linear and quadratic effects on regulation success but was unrelated to emotional reactivity. Study 2 replicated and extended these findings using a different reappraisal task and further showed that situational (i.e., social vs. nonsocial stimuli) and dispositional (i.e., level of rejection sensitivity) social factors interacted with age to predict regulation success: young adolescents were less successful at regulating responses to social than to nonsocial stimuli, particularly if the adolescents were high in rejection sensitivity. Taken together, these results have important implications for the inclusion of emotion regulation in models of emotional and cognitive development.

Indexed as

Rejection, PsychologySocial PerceptionAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAdultAge FactorsChildEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22642356
PMCPMC4131311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.