Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22641790›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2012

The FLU-FOBT Program in community clinics: durable benefits of a randomized controlled trial.

Judith M E Walsh, Ginny Gildengorin, Lawrence W Green, Jason Jenkins, Michael B Potter

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. An innovative strategy to reach the underserved for colorectal cancer screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judith M E WalshDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street San Francisco, CA 94115, USA. judith.walsh@ucsf.edu
Ginny Gildengorin
Lawrence W Green
Jason Jenkins
Michael B Potter
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024131 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$111.2M
THE FLU-FOBT PROGRAM: TRANSLATION OF AN EVIDENCE-BASED COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENIR18DP001566 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI POTTER, MICHAEL B · 2008 to 2010
$889k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5R18DP001566-03NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine the extent to which the FLU-FOBT Program, a colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) intervention linking the provision of fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) to the time of annual influenza vaccination, resulted in practice changes in six primary care clinics 1 year after it was introduced in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We assessed CRCS rate changes for influenza vaccine recipients, administered brief serial clinic staff surveys and interviewed clinic leaders 1 year after the RCT. CRCS rates for influenza vaccination recipients between the ages of 50 and 75 years were 42.5% before the RCT, 54.5% immediately after the RCT and 55.8% 1 year after the RCT (P < 0.001 for difference between baseline and 1 year after RCT). Many FLU-FOBT Program components were maintained in most clinics at 1-year follow-up. Only 63% of clinic staff survey respondents (26 of 41) continued offering FOBT with influenza vaccines, but 85% (35 of 41) continued to provide mailing kits with FOBT. Many patient education materials were maintained and staff satisfaction with the intervention remained high. Clinic leaders acknowledged barriers to maintenance but also observed several beneficial practice changes. Many components of the FLU-FOBT Program were maintained, with beneficial outcomes for participating practices.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersOccult BloodAgedColorectal NeoplasmsHealth PromotionHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSan FranciscoInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID22641790
PMCPMC3442378
OpenAlexW2104212043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.