Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22641239›Full record

Trial reportProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2012

Responder analysis of the effects of denosumab on bone mineral density in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

R B Egerdie, F Saad, M R Smith, T L J Tammela, J Heracek, P Sieber, C Ke, B Leder, R Dansey, C Goessl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00089674 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate AMG 162 in the Treatment of Bone Loss in Subjects Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00089674 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate AMG 162 in the Treatment of Bone Loss in Subjects Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2004 to 2010Enrolled1,468ConditionsProstate CancerArmsAMG 162, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Bone Mineral Density After Transitioning From Denosumab to Alendronate.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Trial
  4. Sustained increases in lumbar spine and hip BMD with denosumab therapy beyond 10 years.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

R B EgerdieUrology Associates Urologic Medical Research, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. blairegerdie@mac.com
F Saad
M R Smith
T L J Tammela
J Heracek
P Sieber
C Ke
B Leder
R Dansey
C Goessl
Amgen (United States) · USCenter for Cancer Research · USCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAEnergy and Environmental Consultancy · CZMassachusetts General Hospital · USMedical Research Associates · USTampere University · FIUrology Associates · US

Funding

Midcareer Investigator AwardK24CA121990 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SMITH, MATTHEW RAYMOND · 2007 to 2016
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA121990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDenosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand, increased bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced fracture risk vs placebo in a phase 3 trial in men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The present analysis of this study evaluated BMD changes after 36 months in responder subgroups and in individual patients for three key skeletal sites (lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH)) and the distal radius.

methodsMen with nonmetastatic prostate cancer receiving ADT were treated with subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg (n=734) or placebo (n=734) every 6 months for up to 36 months in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were instructed to take supplemental calcium and vitamin D. For this BMD responder analysis, the primary outcome measure was the percentage change in BMD from baseline to month 36 at the LS, FN and TH as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD at the distal 1/3 radius at 36 months was measured in a substudy of 309 patients.

resultsAt 36 months, significantly more patients in the denosumab arm had increases of >3% BMD from baseline at each site studied compared with placebo (LS, 78 vs 17%; FN, 48 vs 13%; TH, 48 vs 6%; distal 1/3 radius, 40 vs 7% (P<0.0001 for all)). BMD loss at the LS, FN and TH occurred in 1% of denosumab-treated patients vs 42% of placebo patients, and BMD gain at all three sites occurred in 69% of denosumab patients vs 8% of placebo patients. Lower baseline BMD was associated with higher-magnitude BMD responses to denosumab at the LS, FN and TH.

conclusionsIn men with prostate cancer receiving ADT, significantly higher BMD response rates were observed with denosumab vs placebo. Patients with lower baseline T-scores benefited the most from denosumab treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAndrogen AntagonistsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRANK LigandTreatment OutcomeAndrogen AntagonistsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabRANK Ligand

Identifiers

PMID22641239
PMCPMC3671885
OpenAlexW1985553828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.