ArticleAppetite2012
Assessing binge eating. An analysis of data previously collected in bingeing rats.
Article in Appetite, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in hedonic feeding and characterizing the effects of antibiotic-induced microbiome disruption.Research square · 2026Article
- Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP)Psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) in the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus: Influence on binge-type eating in male and female mice.Research square · 2024Article
- Breaking It Down: Investigation of Binge Eating Components in Animal Models to Enhance Translation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
- The Disruptive Effects of Estrogen Removal before Puberty on Risk for Binge Eating in Female Rats.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2020Article
- The effect of the demyelinating agent cuprizone on binge-like eating of sweetened palatable food in female and male C57BL/6 substrains.Appetite · 2020Article
- Short- and long-access palatable food self-administration results in different phenotypes of binge-type eating.Physiology & behavior · 2019Article
- Article
- Binge-Type Eating in Rats is Facilitated by Neuromedin U Receptor 2 in the Nucleus Accumbens and Ventral Tegmental Area.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Genetic differences in the behavioral organization of binge eating, conditioned food reward, and compulsive-like eating in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J strains.Physiology & behavior · 2018Article
- Cytoplasmic FMR1-Interacting Protein 2 Is a Major Genetic Factor Underlying Binge Eating.Biological psychiatry · 2017Article
- Development of bingeing in rats altered by a small operant requirement.Physiology & behavior · 2015Article
- Developmental emergence of an obsessive-compulsive phenotype and binge behavior in rats.Psychopharmacology · 2015Article
- Binge-like eating attenuates nisoxetine feeding suppression, stress activation, and brain norepinephrine activity.PloS one · 2014Article
- Article
- Intermittent access to sweet high-fat liquid induces increased palatability and motivation to consume in a rat model of binge consumption.Physiology & behavior · 2013Article
- From passive overeating to "food addiction": a spectrum of compulsion and severity.ISRN obesity · 2013Review
- 2-Hydroxyestradiol enhances binge onset in female rats and reduces prefrontal cortical dopamine in male rats.Hormones and behavior · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As interest in the study of binge eating has increased, several measures of bingeing have been developed for use in animal models. Two of the measures that have been used to distinguish binge-type from normal intake in animal studies are: (1) comparing intake at a given point in time between groups, and (2) assessing escalation of intake across time within groups. Here we use both of these measures to reanalyze data from 10 previous bingeing experiments conducted in our lab. Additionally, the data from two of these studies were then restructured in order to evaluate the use of these measures in binge eating prone (BEP) and resistant (BER) rats, as described by others. Analyses comparing intake at a given point in time indicated bingeing in all 10 studies, while comparisons of escalation indicated bingeing in 9 out of 10 studies. The goal of this study was to compare and contrast the two measures, identify the strengths and weaknesses of each, and determine their appropriateness for a given set of potential outcomes. The results indicate that both intake and escalation are useful measures. However, their limitations need to be taken into consideration when attempting to operationalize binge-type eating in animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.