Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22640439›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2012

The impact of decision aids to enhance shared decision making for diabetes (the DAD study): protocol of a cluster randomized trial.

Annie LeBlanc, Kari L Ruud, Megan E Branda, Kristina Tiedje, Kasey R Boehmer, Laurie J Pencille, Holly Van Houten, Marc Matthews, Nilay D Shah, Carl R May and 2 more

Registry-linked trialFull text readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00388050 (Wiser Choices for Patients With Type II Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00388050 nacompletednot on this map

Wiser Choices for Patients With Type II Diabetes: Diabetes Medication Choice

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2006 to 2008Enrolled85ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsDiabetes Medication Choice decision aid, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Annie LeBlancDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Kari L Ruud
Megan E Branda
Kristina Tiedje
Kasey R Boehmer
Laurie J Pencille
Holly Van Houten
Marc Matthews
Nilay D Shah
Carl R May
Barbara P Yawn
Victor M Montori

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision making contributes to high quality healthcare by promoting a patient-centered approach. Patient involvement in selecting the components of a diabetes medication program that best match the patient's values and preferences may also enhance medication adherence and improve outcomes. Decision aids are tools designed to involve patients in shared decision making, but their adoption in practice has been limited. In this study, we propose to obtain a preliminary estimate of the impact of patient decision aids vs. usual care on measures of patient involvement in decision making, diabetes care processes, medication adherence, glycemic and cardiovascular risk factor control, and resource utilization. In addition, we propose to identify, describe, and explain factors that promote or inhibit the routine embedding of decision aids in practice. METHODS/

designWe will be conducting a mixed-methods study comprised of a cluster-randomized, practical, multicentered trial enrolling clinicians and their patients (n = 240) with type 2 diabetes from rural and suburban primary care practices (n = 8), with an embedded qualitative study to examine factors that influence the incorporation of decision aids into routine practice. The intervention will consist of the use of a decision aid (Statin Choice and Aspirin Choice, or Diabetes Medication Choice) during the clinical encounter. The qualitative study will include analysis of video recordings of clinical encounters and in-depth, semi-structured interviews with participating patients, clinicians, and clinic support staff, in both trial arms. DISCUSSION: Upon completion of this trial, we will have new knowledge about the effectiveness of diabetes decision aids in these practices. We will also better understand the factors that promote or inhibit the successful implementation and normalization of medication choice decision aids in the care of chronic patients in primary care practices.

trial registrationNCT00388050.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision Support TechniquesPatient ParticipationAspirinCardiovascular DiseasesCluster AnalysisComparative Effectiveness ResearchDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMinnesotaPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchAspirinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22640439
PMCPMC3468357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.