ArticleBMC proceedings2012
XVth QTLMAS: simulated dataset.
Article in BMC proceedings, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Prediction Using Bayesian Regression Models With Global-Local Prior.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The influence of a first-order antedependence model and hyperparameters in BayesCπ for genomic prediction.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2018Article
- A new genotype imputation method with tolerance to high missing rate and rare variants.PloS one · 2014Article
- Inferring haplotypes and parental genotypes in larger full sib-ships and other pedigrees with missing or erroneous genotype data.BMC genetics · 2012Article
- A two step Bayesian approach for genomic prediction of breeding values.BMC proceedings · 2012Article
- Bayesian Variable Selection to identify QTL affecting a simulated quantitative trait.BMC proceedings · 2012Article
- Comparison of the analyses of the XVth QTLMAS common dataset II: QTL analysis.BMC proceedings · 2012Article
- Comparison of analyses of the XVth QTLMAS common dataset III: Genomic Estimations of Breeding Values.BMC proceedings · 2012Article
- Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2011 data using Bayesian and GBLUP methods.BMC proceedings · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur aim was to simulate the data for the QTLMAS2011 workshop following a pig-type family structure under an oligogenic model, each QTL being specific.
resultsThe population comprised 3000 individuals issued from 20 sires and 200 dams. Within each family, 10 progenies belonged to the experimental population and were assigned phenotypes and marker genotypes and 5 belonged to the selection population, only known on their marker genotypes. A total of 10,000 SNPs carried by 5 chromosomes of 1 Morgan each were simulated. Eight QTL were created (1 quadri-allelic, 2 linked in phase, 2 linked in repulsion, 1 imprinted and 2 epistatic). Random noise was added giving an heritability of 0.30. The marker density, LD and MAF were similar to real life parameters.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.