Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22639299›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2012

Development of a per-operative procedure for concentrated bone marrow adjunction in postero-lateral lumbar fusion: radiological, biological and clinical assessment.

G A Odri, A Hami, V Pomero, M Seite, D Heymann, A Bertrand-Vasseur, W Skalli, J Delecrin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stem Cells and Spinal Fusion.International journal of spine surgery · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

G A OdriClinique Chirurgicale Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHU Hôtel Dieu, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes Cedex 1, France. guillaumeanthony.odri@chu-nantes.fr
A Hami
V Pomero
M Seite
D Heymann
A Bertrand-Vasseur
W Skalli
J Delecrin
Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRHôtel-Dieu de Paris · FRInserm · FRLaboratoire de Biomécanique et Mécanique des Chocs · FRMedtronic (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAddition of bone marrow to the bone graft in the postero-lateral lumbar arthrodesis is a widely used technique. Bone marrow brings stem cells and growth factors contained in the platelets, favorable for bone growth. Adjunction of concentrated bone marrow should create better conditions and may increase bone growth.

methodsSimple blind randomized clinical, prospective, monocentric trial was conducted. Fifteen patients underwent lumbar arthrodesis. During surgery, a fraction of the bone marrow harvested was centrifuged. One side received this concentrate with autologous bone and ceramics; the other side received the same graft with unconcentrated bone marrow. A quantitative study, realised with a volume calculating software on CT-scan images, determined the cortical bone volume in the graft post-operatively and at 3 months. The osteoprogenitor cells, nucleated cells and platelet concentrations were determined.

resultsThe biological study found an average concentration of six times for the nucleated cells, 3.5 times for the platelets and 2.2 times for the osteoprogenitor cells. The comparison of the mean cortical bone volumes post-operatively and at 3 months was not significantly different.

conclusionsDespite the concentration obtained, there was no increase of bone growth by adding concentrated bone marrow. However, the number of stem cells in bone marrow was low and maybe a stronger concentration is needed to obtain a difference. The 3D reconstruction of the graft and the analysis of the graft's volume using a novel software was efficient according to the similarity of the graft's volume post-operatively in all patients.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationBone TransplantationFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedSoftwareSpinal FusionTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID22639299
PMCPMC3508230
OpenAlexW2098015511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.