Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22639243›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2013

A further evaluation of decision-making under risk and under ambiguity in schizophrenia.

Guillaume Fond, Sophie Bayard, Delphine Capdevielle, Jonathan Del-Monte, Nawale Mimoun, Alexandra Macgregor, Jean-Philippe Boulenger, Marie-Christine Gely-Nargeot, Stéphane Raffard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of past experiences on decision-making in autism spectrum disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guillaume FondUniversité Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France. guillaume.fond@gmail.com
Sophie Bayard
Delphine Capdevielle
Jonathan Del-Monte
Nawale Mimoun
Alexandra Macgregor
Jean-Philippe Boulenger
Marie-Christine Gely-Nargeot
Stéphane Raffard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal decision-making has been described as a key-concept to understand some behavioral disturbances in schizophrenia. However, whether schizophrenia patients display impairments in profitable decision-making on experimental designs is still controversial (1) to assess performance on decision-making paradigms under ambiguity and under risk conditions in a large sample of schizophrenia patients and (2) to study the impact of clinical variables on decision-making performance in schizophrenia. The Iowa gambling task (IGT) and the game of dice task (GDT) were administered to assess, respectively, decision-making under ambiguity and under risk in 63 schizophrenia patients and 67 healthy controls. In addition, clinical variables (e.g., schizophrenic symptoms, self-reported depression, and impulsivity) were evaluated using appropriate questionnaires the same day. Pharmacological treatments were reported. Schizophrenia patients had impaired performances on both IGT and GDT tasks. No correlation between the decision-making tasks performance and clinical variables was found. Lower gains on the GDT were associated with executive dysfunctioning in schizophrenia. These findings give evidence that schizophrenia patients display impairments in both decision-making under ambiguity and under risk.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultAnalysis of VarianceCognition DisordersComprehensionDecision MakingExecutive FunctionFemaleGames, ExperimentalHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating Scales

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.