Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22637202›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2012

Motion versus fixed distraction of the joint in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Charles L Saltzman, Stephen L Hillis, Mary P Stolley, Donald D Anderson, Annunziato Amendola

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Mid- and long-term effectiveness analysis of distraction arthroplasty in treatment of moderate to severe ankle arthritis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Article
  5. Ankle joint distraction is a promising alternative treatment for patients with severe haemophilic ankle arthropathy.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Ankle distraction arthroplasty (ADA): A brief review and technical pearls.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Arthrofibrosis of the Ankle.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Management of Posttraumatic Ankle Arthritis: Literature Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Joint Distraction in Advanced Osteoarthritis of the Ankle.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Single-stage supramalleolar osteotomy for coronal plane deformity.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charles L SaltzmanUniversity of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. Charles.saltzman@hsc.utah.edu
Stephen L Hillis
Mary P Stolley
Donald D Anderson
Annunziato Amendola
University of Iowa · USIowa City VA Health Care System · USUniversity of Iowa Health Care · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

Tissue and Experimental Modeling CoreP50AR055533 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PEDERSEN, DOUGLAS RAY · 2007 to 2016
$14.9M
Pathological etiology of post-traumatic arthritisP50AR048939 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BUCKWALTER, JOSEPH A. · 2002 to 2006
$4.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR048939NIAMS NIH HHS P50AR048939NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR055533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInitial reports have shown the efficacy of fixed distraction for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that allowing ankle motion during distraction would result in significant improvements in outcomes compared with distraction without ankle motion.

methodsWe conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes for patients with advanced ankle osteoarthritis who were managed with anterior osteophyte removal and either (1) fixed ankle distraction or (2) ankle distraction permitting joint motion. Thirty-six patients were randomized to treatment with either fixed distraction or distraction with motion. The patients were followed for twenty-four months after frame removal. The Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) was the main outcome variable.

resultsTwo years after frame removal, subjects in both groups showed significant improvement compared with the status before treatment (p < 0.02 for both groups). The motion-distraction group had significantly better AOS scores than the fixed-distraction group at twenty-six, fifty-two, and 104 weeks after frame removal (p < 0.01 at each time point). At 104 weeks, the motion-distraction group had an overall mean improvement of 56.6% in the AOS score, whereas the fixed-distraction group had a mean improvement of 22.9% (p < 0.01).

conclusionDistraction improved the patient-reported outcomes of treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. Adding ankle motion to distraction showed an early and sustained beneficial effect on outcome.

Indexed as

External FixatorsAdolescentAdultAnkle JointFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotionOsteoarthritisOsteogenesis, DistractionPain MeasurementPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRadiography

Identifiers

PMID22637202
PMCPMC3364029
OpenAlexW2019334717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.