Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2263610›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1990

Cell line-specific differences in the control of cell cycle progression in the absence of mitosis.

A L Kung, S W Sherwood, R T Schimke

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A L KungDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, CA 94305.
S W Sherwood
R T Schimke

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISM IN RESISTANCE TO FOLATE ANALOGUESR01CA016318 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHIMKE, ROBERT T · 1985 to 1994
–
NCI NIH HHS CA16318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports that there are major differences between mammalian cell lines in the propensity to progress into subsequent cell cycles when mitosis is inhibited with agents that disrupt the assembly of the mitotic spindle apparatus (Colcemid, nocodazole, and taxol). Human HeLa S3 cells, which represent one extreme, remain arrested in mitosis, with elevated levels of cyclin B and p34cdc2 kinase activity. In Chinese hamster ovary cells, at the other extreme, the periodic rise and fall of cyclin B levels and p34cdc2 kinase activity is only transiently inhibited in the absence of mitosis. The cells progress into subsequent cell cycles, without dividing, resulting in serial doublings of cellular DNA content. In general, the propensity to progress into subsequent cell cycles in the absence of mitosis appears to be species related, such that human cell lines remain permanently blocked in a mitotic state, whereas rodent cell lines are only transiently inhibited when spindle assembly is disrupted. We interpret these results to indicate that in mammalian cell lines there exists a checkpoint which serves to couple cell cycle progression to the completion of certain karyokinetic events. Furthermore, either such a checkpoint exists in some cell lines but not in others or the stringency of the control mechanism varies among different cell lines.

Indexed as

Cell CycleAnimalsCDC2 Protein KinaseCell LineCricetinaeCricetulusDemecolcineFemaleHeLa CellsHumansKineticsMiceMitosisOvaryCDC2 Protein KinaseDemecolcine

Identifiers

PMID2263610
PMCPMC55210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.