Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22635525›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2012

A new in vivo model to test anti-tuberculosis drugs using fluorescence imaging.

Andrea Zelmer, Paul Carroll, Nuria Andreu, Kristine Hagens, Jacqueline Mahlo, Natalja Redinger, Brian D Robertson, Siouxsie Wiles, Theresa H Ward, Tanya Parish and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. GlnA3Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Future medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrea ZelmerImmunology and Infection Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St., London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Paul Carroll
Nuria Andreu
Kristine Hagens
Jacqueline Mahlo
Natalja Redinger
Brian D Robertson
Siouxsie Wiles
Theresa H Ward
Tanya Parish
Jorge Ripoll
Gregory J Bancroft
Ulrich E Schaible
Research Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DEImperial College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of London · GBFoundation for Research and Technology Hellas · GRUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe current method for testing new drugs against tuberculosis in vivo is the enumeration of bacteria in organs by cfu assay. Owing to the slow growth rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), these assays can take months to complete. Our aim was to develop a more efficient, fluorescence-based imaging assay to test new antibiotics in a mouse model using Mtb reporter strains.

methodsA commercial IVIS Kinetic® system and a custom-built laser scanning system with fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) capability were used to detect fluorescent Mtb in living mice and lungs ex vivo. The resulting images were analysed and the fluorescence was correlated with data from cfu assays.

resultsWe have shown that fluorescent Mtb can be visualized in the lungs of living mice at a detection limit of ∼8 × 10⁷ cfu/lung, whilst in lungs ex vivo a detection limit of ∼2 × 10⁵ cfu/lung was found. These numbers were comparable between the two imaging systems. Ex vivo lung fluorescence correlated to numbers of bacteria in tissue, and the effect of treatment of mice with the antibiotic moxifloxacin could be visualized and quantified after only 9 days through fluorescence measurements, and was confirmed by cfu assays.

conclusionsWe have developed a new and efficient method for anti-tuberculosis drug testing in vivo, based on fluorescent Mtb reporter strains. Using this method instead of, or together with, cfu assays will reduce the time required to assess the preclinical efficacy of new drugs in animal models and enhance the progress of these candidates into clinical trials against human tuberculosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntitubercular AgentsDisease Models, AnimalFluorescenceGenes, ReporterImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLuminescent ProteinsLungMiceMice, SCIDMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisSensitivity and SpecificityStaining and LabelingTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntitubercular AgentsLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22635525
PMCPMC3394442
OpenAlexW2168123849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.