Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22634696›Full record

ReviewPlastic and reconstructive surgery2012

Assessing strength of evidence in diagnostic tests.

Oluseyi Aliu, Kevin C Chung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Short and Long [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oluseyi AliuAnn Arbor, Mich. From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System.
Kevin C Chung

Funding

A Clinical Trial for the Surgical Treatment of Elderly Distal Radius FracturesR01AR062066 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHUNG, KEVIN C · 2011 to 2016
$3.8M
An Outcome Study of Rheumatoid Hand ArthroplastyR01AR047328 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHUNG, KEVIN C · 2003 to 2016
$3.1M
Evidence-Based Research in Hand SurgeryK24AR053120 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHUNG, KEVIN C · 2008 to 2018
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS 2R01AR047328-06A2NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR053120NIAMS NIH HHS K24AR053120NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR047328NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062066NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR062066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical encounters between clinicians and patients begin with an attempt at diagnosis, a foundational element in determining a patient's ultimate outcome. Diagnosis that is expedient and accurate will result in a treatment that is expedient, appropriate, and cost-effective. In essence, evidence-based diagnosis is as vital as evidence-based intervention and treatment. If surgeons are committed to making expedient and accurate diagnoses, they must strive to apply diagnostic tests not just on the basis of ease, novelty, or availability but for the soundness of evidence behind them. In the scopes of both aesthetic and reconstructive surgery, advocating evidence-driven diagnostic test use is relevant. A pertinent example of how this relates to plastic surgery is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendation to screen asymptomatic women with silicone breast implants with magnetic resonance imaging. For an important recommendation such as this that has tremendous cost implications to patients, sound study design and rigorous evaluation of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging as a screening tool has important health policy implications. The authors demonstrate how to determine the accuracy of diagnostic tests and, more importantly, illustrate the essential qualities of any study to establish the accuracy of a diagnostic test.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis FailureUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID22634696
PMCPMC3361685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.