Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22634532›Full record

Trial reportClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2012

Clinical study on the recombinant human endostatin regarding improving the blood perfusion and hypoxia of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Xiao-Dong Jiang, Peng Dai, Yun Qiao, Jin Wu, Da-An Song, Shi-Qiu Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Dong JiangDepartment of Oncology, Lianyungang First People's Hospital, Lianyungang 222002, China. jxdysy@sohu.com
Peng Dai
Yun Qiao
Jin Wu
Da-An Song
Shi-Qiu Li
The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo observe the dynamic changes of blood perfusion and hypoxic status with CT perfusion imaging and hypoxia imaging in patients of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with recombinant human endostatin (RHES).

methodsFifteen previously untreated patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. They were randomly divided into research group (n=10) and negative control group (n=5). The patients of the research group continuously used RHES for ten days, and simultaneously had CT perfusion imaging and hypoxia imaging performed on days 1, 5 and 10, respectively. The remaining 5(control) only had CT perfusion imaging and hypoxia imaging, without using RHES, on days 1, 5 and 10, respectively. According to the above results, we could obtain a "time window" during which RHES improves blood perfusion and hypoxia of lung cancer.

resultsIn the research group, after using RHES, capillary permeability surface (PS) and tumour to normal tissue (T/N) decreased at first, and then increased. Their lowest points occurred on about the fifth day with statistical significance compared with the first day (T/N, p=0.00; PS, p<0.01). Blood flow (BF) was first increased and then decreased. Its highest point occurred on about the fifth day with statistical significance compared with the first and tenth day (all p<0.01). The PS, BF and T/N peaked on the fifth day in the research group with statistical significance compared with the negative control group as well (all p<0.01). The above results suggested that RHES's "time window" was within about one week after administration.

conclusionRHES's "time window" is within about one week after administration, which provides an important experimental basis for combining RHES with radiotherapy in human tumours.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell HypoxiaEndostatinsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMalePerfusion ImagingRecombinant ProteinsTime FactorsTomography, Spiral ComputedAngiogenesis InhibitorsEndostatinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22634532
OpenAlexW2031583735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.