Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22633559›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2012

The use of evolutionary patterns in protein annotation.

Angela D Wilkins, Benjamin J Bachman, Serkan Erdin, Olivier Lichtarge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrating evidence from protein domains to identify cancer driver mutations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recurrent high-impact mutations at cognate structural positions in class A G protein-coupled receptors expressed in tumors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 3D-PP: A Tool for Discovering Conserved Three-Dimensional Protein Patterns.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computational approaches for classification and prediction of P-type ATPase substrate specificity in Arabidopsis.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The functional importance of co-evolving residues in proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014
    Review
  16. Prediction and experimental validation of enzyme substrate specificity in protein structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prediction and redesign of protein-protein interactions.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela D WilkinsDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Benjamin J Bachman
Serkan Erdin
Olivier Lichtarge

Funding

Functional Determinnats in G Protein-coupled ReceptorsR01GM066099 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LICHTARGE, OLIVIER · 2003 to 2022
$7.5M
Comparative genomics of protein structure and functionR01GM079656 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LICHTARGE, OLIVIER · 2007 to 2019
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066099NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM066099NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079656NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM079656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With genomic data skyrocketing, their biological interpretation remains a serious challenge. Diverse computational methods address this problem by pointing to the existence of recurrent patterns among sequence, structure, and function. These patterns emerge naturally from evolutionary variation, natural selection, and divergence--the defining features of biological systems--and they identify molecular events and shapes that underlie specificity of function and allosteric communication. Here we review these methods, and the patterns they identify in case studies and in proteome-wide applications, to infer and rationally redesign function.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMolecular Sequence AnnotationComputational BiologyGenomicsProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22633559
PMCPMC3439137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.