Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22632833›Full record

ArticleStructure (London, England : 1993)2012

Increasing sequence diversity with flexible backbone protein design: the complete redesign of a protein hydrophobic core.

Grant S Murphy, Jeffrey L Mills, Michael J Miley, Mischa Machius, Thomas Szyperski, Brian Kuhlman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An expandable, modular de novo protein platform for precision redox engineering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Active site center redesign increases protein stability preserving catalysis in thioredoxin.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Advances in protein structure prediction and design.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grant S MurphyDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290, USA.
Jeffrey L Mills
Michael J Miley
Mischa Machius
Thomas Szyperski
Brian Kuhlman
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

University of Georgia ProjectU54GM094597 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MONTELIONE, GAETANO T · 2010 to 2014
$36.9M
Designing Affinity and Specificity at Protein InterfacesR01GM073960 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KUHLMAN, BRIAN A · 2005 to 2018
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073960NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM073960NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein design tests our understanding of protein stability and structure. Successful design methods should allow the exploration of sequence space not found in nature. However, when redesigning naturally occurring protein structures, most fixed backbone design algorithms return amino acid sequences that share strong sequence identity with wild-type sequences, especially in the protein core. This behavior places a restriction on functional space that can be explored and is not consistent with observations from nature, where sequences of low identity have similar structures. Here, we allow backbone flexibility during design to mutate every position in the core (38 residues) of a four-helix bundle protein. Only small perturbations to the backbone, 1-2 Å, were needed to entirely mutate the core. The redesigned protein, DRNN, is exceptionally stable (melting point >140°C). An NMR and X-ray crystal structure show that the side chains and backbone were accurately modeled (all-atom RMSD = 1.3 Å).

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsCrystallography, X-RayHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMonte Carlo MethodNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein StabilityProtein Structure, SecondaryThermotoga maritimaTransition TemperatureBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22632833
PMCPMC3372604
OpenAlexW2080513551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.