Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22632719›Full record

ReviewNeuron2012

How we feel: ion channel partnerships that detect mechanical inputs and give rise to touch and pain perception.

Shana L Geffeney, Miriam B Goodman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. TheThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Shear stress sensing in C. elegans.Current biology : CB · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shana L GeffeneyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Miriam B Goodman
Stanford University · US

Funding

Molecular Basis of Sensory Transduction in C. elegansR01NS047715 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B · 2004 to 2017
$4.9M
Force Clamp Systems for Evaluation of MechanotransductionR01EB006745 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B, PRUITT, BETH L · 2007 to 2014
$3.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006745NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB006745NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047715NINDS NIH HHS R01NS047715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every moment of every day, our skin and its embedded sensory neurons are bombarded with mechanical cues that we experience as pleasant or painful. Knowing the difference between innocuous and noxious mechanical stimuli is critical for survival and relies on the function of mechanoreceptor neurons that vary in their size, shape, and sensitivity. Their function is poorly understood at the molecular level. This review emphasizes the importance of integrating analysis at the molecular and cellular levels and focuses on the discovery of ion channel proteins coexpressed in the mechanoreceptors of worms, flies, and mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansIon ChannelsMechanoreceptorsNociceptorsPain PerceptionPhysical StimulationSensory Receptor CellsTouch PerceptionIon Channels

Identifiers

PMID22632719
PMCPMC3371091
OpenAlexW2062492588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.