ArticlePediatric hematology and oncology2012
Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: are we over-scanning our patients?
Article in Pediatric hematology and oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in FDG PET imaging for staging and prognostic assessment in pediatric lymphoma: a systematic review.Pediatric radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Cumulative radiation doses due to nuclear medicine examinations: a systematic review.The British journal of radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Patients undergoing multipleThe British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Role of surveillance screening in detecting tumor recurrence after treatment of childhood cancers.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Surveillance imaging in pediatric lymphoma.Pediatric radiology · 2019Review
- Software-based PET-MR image coregistration: combined PET-MRI for the rest of us!Pediatric radiology · 2016Article
- Relapse surveillance in AFP-positive hepatoblastoma: re-evaluating the role of imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2014Article
- Pediatric Burkitt's lymphoma and diffuse B-cell lymphoma: are surveillance scans required?Pediatric hematology and oncology · 2014Article
- Surveillance imaging in pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2013Review
- A retrospective comparison of CT and MRI in detecting pediatric cervical spine injury.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2013Article
- Limited role for surveillance PET-CT scanning in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in complete metabolic remission following primary therapy.British journal of cancer · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the favorable outcome of most pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), there is rising concern about risks of carcinogenesis from both diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure for patients treated on study protocols. Although previous studies have investigated radiation exposure during treatment, radiation from post-treatment surveillance imaging may also increase the likelihood of secondary malignancies. All diagnostic imaging examinations involving ionizing radiation exposure performed for surveillance following completion of therapy were recorded for 99 consecutive pediatric patients diagnosed with HL from 2000 to 2010. Cumulative radiation dosage from these examinations and the frequency of relapse detection by these examinations were recorded. In the first 2 years following completion of therapy, patients in remission received a median of 11 examinations (range 0-26). Only 13 of 99 patients relapsed, 11 within 5 months of treatment completion. No relapse was detected by 1- or 2-view chest radiographs (n = 38 and 296, respectively), abdomen/pelvis computed tomography (CT) scans (n = 211), or positron emission tomography (PET) scans alone (n = 11). However, 10/391 (2.6%) of chest CT scans, 4/364 (1.1%) of neck CT scans, and 3/47 (6.4%) of PET/CT scans detected relapsed disease. Thus, only 17 scans (1.3%) detected relapse in a total of 1358 scans. Mean radiation dosages were 31.97 mSv for Stage 1, 37.76 mSv for Stage 2, 48.08 mSv for Stage 3, and 51.35 mSv for Stage 4 HL. Approximately 1% of surveillance imaging examinations identified relapsed disease. Given the very low rate of relapse detection by surveillance imaging stipulated by current protocols for pediatric HL patients, the financial burden of the tests themselves, the high cure rate, and risks of second malignancy from ionizing radiation exposure, modification of the surveillance strategy is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.