Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22630807›Full record

Trial reportJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2012

Effects of interactive voice response self-monitoring on natural resolution of drinking problems: utilization and behavioral economic factors.

Jalie A Tucker, David L Roth, Jin Huang, M Scott Crawford, Cathy A Simpson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Behavioral economic predictors of brief alcohol intervention outcomes.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2015
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Community characteristics and substance-free activity and service access predict membership in alcohol use disorder risk profiles.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. The Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics of Alcohol Use Disorders.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jalie A TuckerDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. jtucker@uab.edu
David L Roth
Jin Huang
M Scott Crawford
Cathy A Simpson

Funding

Recovery &Help-Seeking Processes in Problem DrinkersR01AA008972 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI TUCKER, JALIE A. · 1992 to 2009
$3.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA008972NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA008972NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA008972-16S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMost problem drinkers do not seek help, and many recover on their own. A randomized controlled trial evaluated whether supportive interactive voice response (IVR) self-monitoring facilitated such "natural" resolutions. Based on behavioral economics, effects on drinking outcomes were hypothesized to vary with drinkers' baseline "time horizons," reflecting preferences among commodities of different value available over different delays and with their IVR utilization.

methodRecently resolved untreated problem drinkers were randomized to a 24-week IVR self-monitoring program (n = 87) or an assessment-only control condition (n = 98). Baseline interviews assessed outcome predictors including behavioral economic measures of reward preferences (delay discounting, pre-resolution monetary allocation to alcohol vs. savings). Six-month outcomes were categorized as resolved abstinent, resolved nonabstinent, unresolved, or missing. Complier average causal effect (CACE) models examined IVR self-monitoring effects.

resultsIVR self-monitoring compliers (≥70% scheduled calls completed) were older and had greater pre-resolution drinking control and lower discounting than noncompliers (<70%). A CACE model interaction showed that observed compliers in the IVR group with shorter time horizons (expressed by greater pre-resolution spending on alcohol than savings) were more likely to attain moderation than abstinent resolutions compared with predicted compliers in the control group with shorter time horizons and with all noncompliers. Intention-to-treat analytical models revealed no IVR-related effects. More balanced spending on savings versus alcohol predicted moderation in both approaches.

conclusionsIVR interventions should consider factors affecting IVR utilization and drinking outcomes, including person-specific behavioral economic variables. CACE models provide tools to evaluate interventions involving extended participation.

Indexed as

Economics, BehavioralSelf CareAdultAlabamaAlcoholic BeveragesAlcoholismFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeorgiaHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedMississippiModels, PsychologicalPatient Compliance

Identifiers

PMID22630807
PMCPMC3364333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.