Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22629478›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2012

Drug susceptibility in Leishmania isolates following miltefosine treatment in cases of visceral leishmaniasis and post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis.

Vasundhra Bhandari, Arpita Kulshrestha, Deepak Kumar Deep, Olivia Stark, Vijay Kumar Prajapati, V Ramesh, Shyam Sundar, Gabriele Schonian, Jean Claude Dujardin, Poonam Salotra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Natural Resistance ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. An Update on Clinical and Pathogenic Spectra of Leishmaniasis.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Antimony susceptibleMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Vasundhra BhandariNational Institute of Pathology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, India.
Arpita Kulshrestha
Deepak Kumar Deep
Olivia Stark
Vijay Kumar Prajapati
V Ramesh
Shyam Sundar
Gabriele Schonian
Jean Claude Dujardin
Poonam Salotra
Safdarjang Hospital · INBanaras Hindu University · INCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEIndian Council of Medical Research · INInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith widespread resistance to antimonials in Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) in the Indian subcontinent, Miltefosine (MIL) has been introduced as the first line therapy. Surveillance of MIL susceptibility in natural populations of Leishmania donovani is vital to preserve it and support the VL elimination program. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsWe measured in vitro susceptibility towards MIL and paromomycin (PMM) in L. donovani isolated from VL and PKDL, pre- and post-treatment cases, using an amastigote-macrophage model. MIL susceptibility of post-treatment isolates from cured VL cases (n = 13, mean IC(50)±SD = 2.43±1.44 µM), was comparable (p>0.05) whereas that from relapses (n = 3, mean IC(50) = 4.72±1.99 µM) was significantly higher (p = 0.04) to that of the pre-treatment group (n = 6, mean IC(50) = 1.86±0.75 µM). In PKDL, post-treatment isolates (n = 3, mean IC(50) = 16.13±2.64 µM) exhibited significantly lower susceptibility (p = 0.03) than pre-treatment isolates (n = 5, mean IC(50) = 8.63±0.94 µM). Overall, PKDL isolates (n = 8, mean IC(50) = 11.45±4.19 µM) exhibited significantly higher tolerance (p<0.0001) to MIL than VL isolates (n = 22, mean IC(50) = 2.58±1.58 µM). Point mutations in the miltefosine transporter (LdMT) and its beta subunit (LdRos3) genes previously reported in parasites with experimentally induced MIL resistance were not present in the clinical isolates. Further, the mRNA expression profile of these genes was comparable in the pre- and post-treatment isolates. Parasite isolates from VL and PKDL cases were uniformly susceptible to PMM with respective mean IC(50) = 7.05±2.24 µM and 6.18±1.51 µM.

conclusionThe in vitro susceptibility of VL isolates remained unchanged at the end of MIL treatment; however, isolates from relapsed VL and PKDL cases had lower susceptibility than the pre-treatment isolates. PKDL isolates were more tolerant towards MIL in comparison with VL isolates. All parasite isolates were uniformly susceptible to PMM. Mutations in the LdMT and LdRos3 genes as well as changes in the expression of these genes previously correlated with experimental resistance to MIL could not be verified for the field isolates.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsChildFemaleHumansIndiaInhibitory Concentration 50Leishmania donovaniLeishmaniasis, CutaneousLeishmaniasis, VisceralMacrophagesMaleMiddle AgedParasitic Sensitivity TestsAntiprotozoal AgentsmiltefosineParomomycinPhosphorylcholine

Identifiers

PMID22629478
PMCPMC3358331
OpenAlexW2133839431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.