ArticleFrontiers in genetics2012
Systems biology approach to identify gene network signatures for colorectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the diagnostic threshold: paradigm shift in laboratory medicine from passive reaction to predictive capability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Integrative systems biology identifiesGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025Article
- Combinatorial Network of Transcriptional and miRNA Regulation in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Predicting clinical response to everolimus in ER+ breast cancers using machine-learning.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Inferring novel genes related to colorectal cancer via random walk with restart algorithm.Gene therapy · 2019Article
- The Crucial Role of CXCL8 and Its Receptors in Colorectal Liver Metastasis.Disease markers · 2019Review
- Gene Regulatory Network Perturbation by Genetic and Epigenetic Variation.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2018Review
- Article
- Revealing the Determinants of Widespread Alternative Splicing Perturbation in Cancer.Cell reports · 2017Article
- Gene expression study and pathway analysis of histological subtypes of intestinal metaplasia that progress to gastric cancer.PloS one · 2017Article
- Identification of commonly dysregulated genes in colorectal cancer by integrating analysis of RNA-Seq data and qRT-PCR validation.Cancer gene therapy · 2015Article
- GESearch: An Interactive GUI Tool for Identifying Gene Expression Signature.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Galaxy tools to study genome diversity.GigaScience · 2013Article
- PAGED: a pathway and gene-set enrichment database to enable molecular phenotype discoveries.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we integrated prior knowledge from gene signatures and protein interactions with gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and gene/protein network modeling together to identify gene network signatures from gene expression microarray data. We demonstrated how to apply this approach into discovering gene network signatures for colorectal cancer (CRC) from microarray datasets. First, we used GSEA to analyze the microarray data through enriching differential genes in different CRC-related gene sets from two publicly available up-to-date gene set databases - Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) and Gene Signatures Database (GeneSigDB). Second, we compared the enriched gene sets through enrichment score, false-discovery rate, and nominal p-value. Third, we constructed an integrated protein-protein interaction (PPI) network through connecting these enriched genes by high-quality interactions from a human annotated and predicted protein interaction database, with a confidence score labeled for each interaction. Finally, we mapped differential gene expressions onto the constructed network to build a comprehensive network model containing visualized transcriptome and proteome data. The results show that although MSigDB has more CRC-relevant gene sets than GeneSigDB, the integrated PPI network connecting the enriched genes from both MSigDB and GeneSigDB can provide a more complete view for discovering gene network signatures. We also found several important sub-network signatures for CRC, such as TP53 sub-network, PCNA sub-network, and IL8 sub-network, corresponding to apoptosis, DNA repair, and immune response, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.