Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22628533›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2013

Evolution of saxitoxin synthesis in cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates.

Jeremiah D Hackett, Jennifer H Wisecaver, Michael L Brosnahan, David M Kulis, Donald M Anderson, Debashish Bhattacharya, F Gerald Plumley, Deana L Erdner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biosynthesis of guanidine-containing natural products in cyanobacteria.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metabolomics Applied to Cyanobacterial Toxins and Natural Products.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jeremiah D HackettDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, AZ, USA. hackettj@email.arizona.edu
Jennifer H Wisecaver
Michael L Brosnahan
David M Kulis
Donald M Anderson
Debashish Bhattacharya
F Gerald Plumley
Deana L Erdner
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution · USUniversity of Arizona · USBermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences · BMRutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights · NLThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Woods Hole Center for Oceans and Human HealthP50ES012742 · NIEHS · WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION · PI STEGEMAN, JOHN J · 2004 to 2009
$2.8M
Developing genomic resources:the toxic dinoflagellateR01ES013679 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BHATTACHARYA, DEBASHISH · 2006 to 2008
$1.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS 1 P50 ES012742NIEHS NIH HHS P50 ES012742NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES013679NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES013679-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dinoflagellates produce a variety of toxic secondary metabolites that have a significant impact on marine ecosystems and fisheries. Saxitoxin (STX), the cause of paralytic shellfish poisoning, is produced by three marine dinoflagellate genera and is also made by some freshwater cyanobacteria. Genes involved in STX synthesis have been identified in cyanobacteria but are yet to be reported in the massive genomes of dinoflagellates. We have assembled comprehensive transcriptome data sets for several STX-producing dinoflagellates and a related non-toxic species and have identified 265 putative homologs of 13 cyanobacterial STX synthesis genes, including all of the genes directly involved in toxin synthesis. Putative homologs of four proteins group closely in phylogenies with cyanobacteria and are likely the functional homologs of sxtA, sxtG, and sxtB in dinoflagellates. However, the phylogenies do not support the transfer of these genes directly between toxic cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates. SxtA is split into two proteins in the dinoflagellates corresponding to the N-terminal portion containing the methyltransferase and acyl carrier protein domains and a C-terminal portion with the aminotransferase domain. Homologs of sxtB and N-terminal sxtA are present in non-toxic strains, suggesting their functions may not be limited to saxitoxin production. Only homologs of the C-terminus of sxtA and sxtG were found exclusively in toxic strains. A more thorough survey of STX+ dinoflagellates will be needed to determine if these two genes may be specific to SXT production in dinoflagellates. The A. tamarense transcriptome does not contain homologs for the remaining STX genes. Nevertheless, we identified candidate genes with similar predicted biochemical activities that account for the missing functions. These results suggest that the STX synthesis pathway was likely assembled independently in the distantly related cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates, although using some evolutionarily related proteins. The biological role of STX is not well understood in either cyanobacteria or dinoflagellates. However, STX production in these two ecologically distinct groups of organisms suggests that this toxin confers a benefit to producers that we do not yet fully understand.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularCyanobacteriaDinoflagellidaGenes, BacterialPhylogenySaxitoxinSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeSaxitoxin

Identifiers

PMID22628533
PMCPMC3525144
OpenAlexW2120862378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.