ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2012
Targeted fluconazole prophylaxis for high-risk very low birth weight infants.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Guideline
- Fluconazole prophylaxis in preterm infants: a systematic review.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesPooled it
- Fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive candidiasis in infants.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2014Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antifungal prophylaxis is increasingly used in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants who are at risk for severe fungal infections. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of targeted fluconazole prophylaxis for high-risk VLBW infants. A retrospective cohort study with historical controls was performed. During the period 2007-2008, all high-risk VLBW infants (birth weight, ≤1,000 g; gestational age, ≤28 weeks; seven antimicrobial therapy or additional risk factors present) received fluconazole prophylaxis until risk factors were not present. Treated infants were compared to a gestational age- and birth weight-matched untreated cohort. Statistical analyses used univariate and multivariate analyses. The main outcome variable was a breakthrough fungal bloodstream infection (BSI). The prophylaxis cohort of 130 VLBW infants was compared to 319 control infants. The rate of fungal infections was significantly lower in the fluconazole prophylaxis group (1 of 130 vs. 19 of 319, p = 0.016); however, they did not differ in mortality (16.2 vs. 15 %, p = 0.77) or complications of prematurity. Fluconazole prophylaxis was associated with a significant decrease in candidal BSI (odds ratio, 0.05; 95 % confidence interval, 0.005-0.523). Selective vs. nonselective prophylaxis reduced the number of infants treated from 247 to 130. Conclusion Targeted fluconazole prophylaxis in VLBW infants is effective in preventing fungal infections without increasing the risk of BSI among low-risk infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.