Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22627376›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroscience methods2012

Effects of 30Hz θ burst transcranial magnetic stimulation on the primary motor cortex.

Steve W Wu, Nasrin Shahana, David A Huddleston, Donald L Gilbert

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steve W WuDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. steve.wu@cchmc.org
Nasrin Shahana
David A Huddleston
Donald L Gilbert

Funding

Neurology of Deficient Response Control in ADHDR01MH085328 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2009 to 2019
$7.3M
Anomalous Motor Physiology In ADHDR01MH078160 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2006 to 2024
$5.8M
Cortical Excitability: Phenotype and Biomarker in ADHD TherapyR01MH081854 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SALLEE, FLOYD R · 2009 to 2012
$2.3M
The Role of SLITRK1 in Tourette and Related DisordersR01NS056276 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STATE, MATTHEW W. · 2006 to 2010
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078160NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081854NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085328NINDS NIH HHS NS056276NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS056276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) is a relatively new form of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) used to probe neuroplasticity in the human cortex. Thirty-Hz TBS, a variation of the originally described 50Hz TBS, has been shown to induce cortical changes in several nonmotor regions. However, its effects over the primary motor cortex have not been examined. Due to TMS device mechanical properties, 30Hz TBS is advantageous over 50Hz TBS in that it can be delivered at higher stimulation intensities. The goal of this pilot study is to examine the neurophysiologic effects of 30Hz TBS on the primary motor cortex (M1) of healthy adults. Eighteen right-handed adults (33±9.0 years; M:F=8:10) completed intermittent TBS (iTBS) or continuous TBS (cTBS) over left M1. TBS was performed with Magstim® SuperRapid2 with stimulation bursts (3 pulses at 30Hz) repeating every 200ms. For iTBS, each 2-s stimulation train was separated by 8s but there was no pause between trains for cTBS. Each TBS consisted of a total of 600 pulses delivered at an intensity of 90%*Resting Motor Threshold. Motor-Evoked Potentials (MEP) in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle were measured before, and one and ten minutes after TBS. Pre/post-TBS MEP amplitudes were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. MEP amplitudes increased after 30Hz iTBS and decreased after 30Hz cTBS (TBS-Type*Time effect p=0.009). In conclusion, 30Hz TBS induced similar neurophysiologic effects over M1 as conventional 50Hz TBS.

Indexed as

AdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityPilot ProjectsTheta RhythmTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22627376
PMCPMC3398243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.