Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22626059›Full record

ReviewNeurogastroenterology and motility2012

What are the important subsets of gastroparesis?

M Camilleri, M Grover, G Farrugia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Disturbed gastric motility in patients with long-standing diabetes mellitus.Journal of smooth muscle research = Nihon Heikatsukin Gakkai kikanshi · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. White Paper AGA: Gastroparesis: Clinical and Regulatory Insights for Clinical Trials.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Pyloric Therapies for Gastroparesis.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  12. Novel Diet, Drugs, and Gastric Interventions for Gastroparesis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. DiabeticCellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2016
    Article
  15. Macrophages in diabetic gastroparesis--the missing link?Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M CamilleriClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. camilleri.michael@mayo.edu
M Grover
G Farrugia
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Physiological Characterization and Data Integration CoreP01DK068055 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI FARRUGIA, GIANRICO · 2004 to 2019
$23.8M
Pharmacogenomics of Gastric Function &Weight in ObesityR01DK067071 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CAMILLERI, MICHAEL L. · 2004 to 2020
$4.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK068055NIDDK NIH HHS P01-DK068055NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroparesis is often divided into subsets based on etiology and pathophysiology; however, the utility of these subsets in the diagnosis and treatment of gastro-paresis is not well defined. The objectives are to consider the subsets of gastroparesis from the perspectives of etiology and pathogenesis, pathophysiology, histopathology, and clinical associations, with particular focus on similarities and differences between diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis and consideration of the potential subset of painful gastroparesis. We conclude that idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis has similar initial presentations and manifestations, except that idiopathic gastroparesis tends to be associated more frequently with pain. Myopathic disorders are uncommon. Extrinsic denervation was considered the most common etiology; however, with the decline in surgery for peptic ulceration and in-depth study of full-thickness gastric biopsies, the most common intrinsic defects are being recognized in the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC-opathy) and with immune infiltration and neuronal changes (intrinsic neuropathic gastroparesis). Histomorphological differences at the microscopic level between diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis are still of unclear significance. Two gastroparesis subsets worthy of special mention, because they are potentially reversible with identification of the cause, are postviral gastroparesis, which has a generally good prognosis, and iatrogenic gastroparesis, especially in patients with non-surgical gastroparesis, such as diabetics exposed to incretins such as pramlintide and exenatide.

Indexed as

GastroparesisHumans

Identifiers

PMID22626059
PMCPMC3785986
OpenAlexW1623660432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.