Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22624061›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Development and validation of Burkholderia pseudomallei-specific real-time PCR assays for clinical, environmental or forensic detection applications.

Erin P Price, Julia L Dale, James M Cook, Derek S Sarovich, Meagan L Seymour, Jennifer L Ginther, Emily L Kaufman, Stephen M Beckstrom-Sternberg, Mark Mayo, Mirjam Kaestli and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Stability assessment of whole cell ELISA for Burkholderia pseudomallei antibodies detection.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Human Melioidosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Case Report: Imported Melioidosis from Goa, India to Israel, 2018.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Erin P PriceCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Julia L Dale
James M Cook
Derek S Sarovich
Meagan L Seymour
Jennifer L Ginther
Emily L Kaufman
Stephen M Beckstrom-Sternberg
Mark Mayo
Mirjam Kaestli
Mindy B Glass
Jay E Gee
Vanaporn Wuthiekanun
Jeffrey M Warner
Anthony Baker
Jeffrey T Foster
Patrick Tan
Apichai Tuanyok
Direk Limmathurotsakul
Sharon J Peacock
Bart J Currie
David M Wagner
Paul Keim
Talima Pearson
Northern Arizona University · USMenzies School of Health Research · AUCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USJames Cook University · AUTranslational Genomics Research Institute · USGenome Institute of Singapore · SGMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THMahidol University · THUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Vaccines and Diagnostics TrialsU54AI065359 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARBOUR, ALAN G. · 2005 to 2013
$88.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI065359Wellcome Trust 089275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei causes melioidosis, a rare but serious illness that can be fatal if untreated or misdiagnosed. Species-specific PCR assays provide a technically simple method for differentiating B. pseudomallei from near-neighbor species. However, substantial genetic diversity and high levels of recombination within this species reduce the likelihood that molecular signatures will differentiate all B. pseudomallei from other Burkholderiaceae. Currently available molecular assays for B. pseudomallei detection lack rigorous validation across large in silico datasets and isolate collections to test for specificity, and none have been subjected to stringent quality control criteria (accuracy, precision, selectivity, limit of quantitation (LoQ), limit of detection (LoD), linearity, ruggedness and robustness) to determine their suitability for environmental, clinical or forensic investigations. In this study, we developed two novel B. pseudomallei specific assays, 122018 and 266152, using a dual-probe approach to differentiate B. pseudomallei from B. thailandensis, B. oklahomensis and B. thailandensis-like species; other species failed to amplify. Species specificity was validated across a large DNA panel (>2,300 samples) comprising Burkholderia spp. and non-Burkholderia bacterial and fungal species of clinical and environmental relevance. Comparison of assay specificity to two previously published B. pseudomallei-specific assays, BurkDiff and TTS1, demonstrated comparable performance of all assays, providing between 99.7 and 100% specificity against our isolate panel. Last, we subjected 122018 and 266152 to rigorous quality control analyses, thus providing quantitative limits of assay performance. Using B. pseudomallei as a model, our study provides a framework for comprehensive quantitative validation of molecular assays and provides additional, highly validated B. pseudomallei assays for the scientific research community.

Indexed as

Burkholderia pseudomalleiMelioidosisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNASpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22624061
PMCPMC3356290
OpenAlexW2147963625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.