ArticlePloS one2012
Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites?
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acoustic overtones improve the discrimination of conspecific female calls by male common cuckoos from similar heterospecific calls.Animal cognition · 2025Article
- Cuckoo eyes are an important identification cue for the Oriental reed warbler host.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025Article
- Host nest defence does not act as selective agent against plumage polymorphism in brood parasites.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Costly conspicuousness reveals benefits of sexual dimorphism in brood parasitic diederik cuckoos.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Oriental reed warblers retain strong egg recognition abilities during the nestling stage.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Defense behavior of two closely related but geographically distant host species against cuckoo parasitism: A next test for the parallel coevolution.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Aggressive hosts are undeterred by a cuckoo's hawk mimicry, but probably make good foster parents.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- A kestrel without hooked beak and talons is not a kestrel for the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio).Animal cognition · 2021Article
- Untrained birds' ability to recognise predators with changed body size and colouration in a field experiment.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Daytime eyeshine contributes to pupil camouflage in a cryptobenthic marine fish.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Asymmetry of eye color in the common cuckoo.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- The common redstart as a suitable model to study cuckoo-host coevolution in a unique ecological context.BMC evolutionary biology · 2016Article
- Females that experience threat are better teachers.Biology letters · 2014Article
- Host response to cuckoo song is predicted by the future risk of brood parasitism.Frontiers in zoology · 2013Article
- Color plumage polymorphism and predator mimicry in brood parasites.Frontiers in zoology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCo-evolutionary struggles between dangerous enemies (e.g., brood parasites) and their victims (hosts) lead to the emergence of sophisticated adaptations and counter-adaptations. Salient host tricks to reduce parasitism costs include, as front line defence, adult enemy discrimination. In contrast to the well studied egg stage, investigations addressing the specific cues for adult enemy recognition are rare. Previous studies have suggested barred underparts and yellow eyes may provide cues for the recognition of cuckoos Cuculus canorus by their hosts; however, no study to date has examined the role of the two cues simultaneously under a consistent experimental paradigm. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe modify and extend previous work using a novel experimental approach--custom-made dummies with various combinations of hypothesized recognition cues. The salient recognition cue turned out to be the yellow eye. Barred underparts, the only trait examined previously, had a statistically significant but small effect on host aggression highlighting the importance of effect size vs. statistical significance.
conclusionRelative importance of eye vs. underpart phenotypes may reflect ecological context of host-parasite interaction: yellow eyes are conspicuous from the typical direction of host arrival (from above), whereas barred underparts are poorly visible (being visually blocked by the upper part of the cuckoo's body). This visual constraint may reduce usefulness of barred underparts as a reliable recognition cue under a typical situation near host nests. We propose a novel hypothesis that recognition cues for enemy detection can vary in a context-dependent manner (e.g., depending on whether the enemy is approached from below or from above). Further we suggest a particular cue can trigger fear reactions (escape) in some hosts/populations whereas the same cue can trigger aggression (attack) in other hosts/populations depending on presence/absence of dangerous enemies that are phenotypically similar to brood parasites and costs and benefits associated with particular host responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.