Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22624022›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections in a general hospital: patient characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility, and treatment outcome.

George Samonis, Drosos E Karageorgopoulos, Sofia Maraki, Panagiotis Levis, Dimitra Dimopoulou, Nikolaos A Spernovasilis, Diamantis P Kofteridis, Matthew E Falagas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Clinical, microbiological, and molecular characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for mortality of patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. What Drives Mortality inMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  8. In vitro antimicrobial activity and clinical use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for infections due to KPC-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Factors in Clinical Isolates ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. UpraisingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

George SamonisDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Drosos E Karageorgopoulos
Sofia Maraki
Panagiotis Levis
Dimitra Dimopoulou
Nikolaos A Spernovasilis
Diamantis P Kofteridis
Matthew E Falagas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStenotrophomonas maltophilia is acquiring increasing importance as a nosocomial pathogen.

methodsWe retrospectively studied the characteristics and outcome of patients with any type of S. maltophilia infection at the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece, between 1/2005-12/2010. S. maltophilia antimicrobial susceptibility was tested with the agar dilution method. Prognostic factors for all-cause in-hospital mortality were assessed with multivariate logistic regression.

resultsSixty-eight patients (median age: 70.5 years; 64.7% males) with S. maltophilia infection, not related to cystic fibrosis, were included. The 68 patients were hospitalized in medical (29.4%), surgical (26.5%), hematology/oncology departments (23.5%), or the intensive care units (ICU; 20.6%). The most frequent infection types were respiratory tract (54.4%), bloodstream (16.2%), skin/soft tissue (10.3%), and intra-abdominal (8.8%) infection. The S. maltophilia-associated infection was polymicrobial in 33.8% of the cases. In vitro susceptibility was higher to colistin (91.2%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and netilmicin (85.3% each), and ciprofloxacin (82.4%). The empirical and the targeted treatment regimens were microbiologically appropriate for 47.3% and 63.6% of the 55 patients with data available, respectively. Most patients received targeted therapy with a combination of agents other than trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The crude mortality and the mortality and the S. maltophilia infection-related mortality were 14.7% and 4.4%, respectively. ICU hospitalization was the only independent prognostic factor for mortality.

conclusionS. maltophilia infection in a general hospital can be associated with a good prognosis, except for the patients hospitalized in the ICU. Combination reigmens with fluoroquinolones, colistin, or tigecycline could be alternative treatment options to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialStenotrophomonas maltophiliaAgedCiprofloxacinColistinColony Count, MicrobialCross InfectionFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsGreeceHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNetilmicinRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricCiprofloxacinColistinNetilmicinTrimethoprim

Identifiers

PMID22624022
PMCPMC3356252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.