Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22623997›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Memory immune responses against pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus induced by a whole particle vaccine in cynomolgus monkeys carrying Mafa-A1*052:02.

Masahiko Arikata, Yasushi Itoh, Masatoshi Okamatsu, Toshinaga Maeda, Takashi Shiina, Keiko Tanaka, Shingo Suzuki, Misako Nakayama, Yoshihiro Sakoda, Hirohito Ishigaki and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiko ArikataDivision of Pathology and Disease Regulation, Department of Pathology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Yasushi Itoh
Masatoshi Okamatsu
Toshinaga Maeda
Takashi Shiina
Keiko Tanaka
Shingo Suzuki
Misako Nakayama
Yoshihiro Sakoda
Hirohito Ishigaki
Ayato Takada
Hideaki Ishida
Kosuke Soda
Van Loi Pham
Hideaki Tsuchiya
Shinichiro Nakamura
Ryuzo Torii
Takeshi Shimizu
Hidetoshi Inoko
Iwao Ohkubo
Hiroshi Kida
Kazumasa Ogasawara
Shiga University of Medical Science · JPHokkaido University · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We made an H1N1 vaccine candidate from a virus library consisting of 144 ( = 16 HA×9 NA) non-pathogenic influenza A viruses and examined its protective effects against a pandemic (2009) H1N1 strain using immunologically naïve cynomolgus macaques to exclude preexisting immunity and to employ a preclinical study since preexisting immunity in humans previously vaccinated or infected with influenza virus might make comparison of vaccine efficacy difficult. Furthermore, macaques carrying a major histocompatibility complex class I molecule, Mafa-A1*052:02, were used to analyze peptide-specific CD8(+) T cell responses. Sera of macaques immunized with an inactivated whole particle formulation without addition of an adjuvant showed higher neutralization titers against the vaccine strain A/Hokkaido/2/1981 (H1N1) than did sera of macaques immunized with a split formulation. Neutralization activities against the pandemic strain A/Narita/1/2009 (H1N1) in sera of macaques immunized twice with the split vaccine reached levels similar to those in sera of macaques immunized once with the whole particle vaccine. After inoculation with the pandemic virus, the virus was detected in nasal samples of unvaccinated macaques for 6 days after infection and for 2.67 days and 5.33 days on average in macaques vaccinated with the whole particle vaccine and the split vaccine, respectively. After the challenge infection, recall neutralizing antibody responses against the pandemic virus and CD8(+) T cell responses specific for nucleoprotein peptide NP262-270 bound to Mafa-A1*052:02 in macaques vaccinated with the whole particle vaccine were observed more promptly or more vigorously than those in macaques vaccinated with the split vaccine. These findings demonstrated that the vaccine derived from our virus library was effective for pandemic virus infection in macaques and that the whole particle vaccine conferred more effective memory and broader cross-reactive immune responses to macaques against pandemic influenza virus infection than did the split vaccine.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, ViralBody TemperatureChromatography, LiquidCytokinesDNA, ComplementaryDNA PrimersEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGenes, MHC Class IImmunologic MemoryInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesMacaca fascicularisMolecular Sequence DataNeutralization TestsAntibodies, ViralCytokinesDNA, ComplementaryDNA PrimersInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID22623997
PMCPMC3356377
OpenAlexW2072182527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.