ArticleRadiology2012
Falling prey to the sunk cost bias: a potential harm of patient radiation dose histories.
Article in Radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translating evidence into practice: a longitudinal qualitative exploration of allied health decision-making.Health research policy and systems · 2021Trial
- Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2021Review
- The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2021Review
- Patient cumulative radiation exposure-the potential for unintended consequences.European radiology · 2020Article
- Organ dose variability and trends in tomosynthesis and radiography.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2017Article
- From 'Image Gently' to image intelligently: a personalized perspective on diagnostic radiation risk.Pediatric radiology · 2014Review
- The communication of the radiation risk from CT in relation to its clinical benefit in the era of personalized medicine: part 2: benefits versus risk of CT.Pediatric radiology · 2014Article
- Prioritizing examination-centered over patient-centered dose reduction: a hazard of institutional "benchmarking".AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2014Article
- Patient-centered imaging: shared decision making for cardiac imaging procedures with exposure to ionizing radiation.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2014Review
- Current knowledge on tumour induction by computed tomography should be carefully used.European radiology · 2014Review
- Journal club: How radiation exposure histories influence physician imaging decisions: a multicenter radiologist survey study.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2013Article
- Patients with testicular cancer undergoing CT surveillance demonstrate a pitfall of radiation-induced cancer risk estimates: the timing paradox.Radiology · 2013Article
- Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
- Are Continued Efforts to Reduce Radiation Exposures from X-Rays Warranted?Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.