Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22623539›Full record

ReviewAJR. American journal of roentgenology2012

Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management.

Sadhna Verma, Baris Turkbey, Naira Muradyan, Arumugam Rajesh, Francois Cornud, Masoom A Haider, Peter L Choyke, Mukesh Harisinghani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A signal model for fat-suppressed TNMR in biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sadhna VermaDepartment of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761, USA. drsadhnaverma@gmail.com
Baris Turkbey
Naira Muradyan
Arumugam Rajesh
Francois Cornud
Masoom A Haider
Peter L Choyke
Mukesh Harisinghani

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
Angiogenesis imagingZIABC010714 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2015
$4.7M
Prostate Cancer ImagingZ01BC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2005 to 2008
$2.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis article is a primer on the technical aspects of performing a high-quality dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) examination of the prostate gland.

conclusionDCE-MRI is emerging as a useful clinical technique as part of a multi-parametric approach for evaluating the extent of primary and recurrent prostate cancer. Performing a high-quality DCE-MRI examination requires a good understanding of the technical aspects and limitations of image acquisition and postprocessing techniques.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeovascularization, PathologicProstatic NeoplasmsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID22623539
PMCPMC6309691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.