ArticleExperimental brain research2012
Central fixations with rightward deviations: saccadic eye movements on the landmark task.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between alertness and spatial attention under simulated shiftwork.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Line bisection by eye and by hand reveal opposite biases.Experimental brain research · 2013Trial
- Adaptive rightward gaze shifts support configural object recognition during perceptual challenge.iScience · 2026Article
- Distortion of perceived visual space after prolonged horizontal eccentric gaze holding.Vision research · 2026Article
- Article
- Hemispheric asymmetries in perceived depth revealed through a radial line bisection task.Experimental brain research · 2016Article
- Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.Experimental brain research · 2014Article
- On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.NeuroImage · 2014Article
- A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurologically normal individuals show an attentional bias toward the left side, which results from right hemisphere activation during visuospatial tasks. The strength of this bias is influenced by various factors, such as line length, vertical elevation and presentation time. What remains unknown is how participants gather information via saccadic eye movements during task performance and how this relates to their responses. Eye movements were recorded while participants performed the landmark task. Fixations and saccades were both analysed to gain a complete understanding of eye movement patterns. Fixations tended to focus on the centre of the line, with few left-right differences. Saccades were examined by creating histograms illustrating all x-coordinates which were examined over the course of each trial. Interestingly, mean eye position varied with participant response, with an overall tendency to look to the right of centre. Results are consistent with prior research, which has primarily looked at fixations and demonstrates the necessity of examining saccades as well as fixations in order to see how eye movement patterns relate to pseudoneglect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22623091What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.