Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22623016›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2012

Pharmacodynamic profile of tramadol in humans: influence of naltrexone pretreatment.

William W Stoops, Michelle R Lofwall, Paul A Nuzzo, Lori B Craig, Anthony J Siegel, Sharon L Walsh

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Pharmacogenetics of Tramadol.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William W StoopsDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 140 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA. william.stoops@uky.edu
Michelle R Lofwall
Paul A Nuzzo
Lori B Craig
Anthony J Siegel
Sharon L Walsh
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
KENTUCKY CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCEUL1RR033173 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2011 to 2011
$3.5M
Neuropharmacology of Tramadol: Clinical Efficacy and Abuse PotentialR01DA025649 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2009 to 2010
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033173NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR033173NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025649NIDA NIH HHS R01DA025649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTramadol is a prescription analgesic that activates mu opioid and monoamine receptor systems. Tramadol is thought to have limited abuse potential compared to mu opioid agonists, but laboratory data indicate that it shares some of their pharmacodynamic effects.

objectivesThis study evaluated the effect of mu opioid receptor blockade with naltrexone on the pharmacodynamic action of tramadol in humans.

methodsThis inpatient, double-blind, randomized, within-subject study examined the effects of oral placebo, tramadol (87.5, 175, and 350 mg), and hydromorphone (4 and 16 mg; positive control) after 1 h pretreatment with oral naltrexone (0 and 50 mg). Ten recreational opioid users completed the study. Pharmacodynamic effects were measured before and for 7 h after initial drug administration.

resultsLower doses of tramadol and hydromorphone were generally placebo-like. Hydromorphone (16 mg) produced prototypic mu opioid agonist-like effects that were blocked by naltrexone. Tramadol (350 mg) produced miosis and increased ratings of "Good Effects" and "Liking" but also increased ratings of "Bad Effects." Naltrexone reversed tramadol-induced physiological effects and mydriasis emerged, but unlike results with hydromorphone, naltrexone only partially attenuated tramadol's positive subjective effects and actually enhanced several unpleasant subjective ratings.

conclusionsNaltrexone can be used to disentangle the mixed neuropharmacological actions of tramadol. High-dose tramadol produces a mixed profile of effects. These data suggest that both mu and non-mu opioid actions play a role in tramadol's subjective profile of action.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHydromorphoneMaleMiddle AgedNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, muTramadolAnalgesics, OpioidHydromorphoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, muTramadol

Identifiers

PMID22623016
PMCPMC3439600
OpenAlexW2095093530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.