Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22622674›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2012

[Resources and risks in old age: the LUCAS-I marker set for a classification of elderly people as fit, pre-frail and frail. First results on validity from the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS), Hamburg].

U Dapp, J Anders, S Golgert, W von Renteln-Kruse, C E Minder

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Frailty in anesthesia.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frailty in elderly patients with acute appendicitis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Missing frailty-missing the point.]Der Anaesthesist · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Determinants of Perioperative Outcome in Frail Older Patients.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Frailty.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

U DappForschungsabteilung, Zentrum für Geriatrie und Gerontologie, Albertinen-Haus, Wissenschaftliche Einrichtung an der Universität Hamburg, Sellhopsweg 18-22, 22459 Hamburg. ulrike.dapp@albertinen.de
J Anders
S Golgert
W von Renteln-Kruse
C E Minder

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a need for a simple self-administered instrument to assess frailty in community-dwelling seniors.

methodsWe present a new marker set to assess the functional state of seniors. Contrary to current literature, we focus not only on risks, but also include resources. The questions relate to facts (ways to do things), rather than on subjective information (e.g. exhaustion). It was developed in the context of the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS) in Hamburg, Germany.

resultsThe classification based on these questions proposes operational definitions of the terms fit, pre-frail and frail and is predictive for need for nursing care as well as mortality. A wealth of results establishes the validity of the categorisation compared to other health questions. One of the classification questions concerns cycling. For areas where cycling is not suitable, we propose to replace this question with one about independently walking 500 m. However, the cycling question appears to indicate frailty earlier.

conclusionThe self-administered questionnaire provides a simple, cost-effective way to screen seniors for early signs of declining function in order to start preventive action.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingFrail ElderlySurveys and QuestionnairesAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentGermanyHealth Status IndicatorsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMass ScreeningPilot ProjectsRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.