Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22622599›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2012

Medulloblastoma.

Katja von Hoff, Stefan Rutkowski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Valproic acid treatment response in vitro is determined by TP53 status in medulloblastoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2018
    Article
  8. Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Detection of tumor-derived DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with primary tumors of the brain and spinal cord.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katja von HoffDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan Rutkowski
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe mainstay of medulloblastoma treatment is high-quality interdisciplinary collaboration in diagnosis, treatment, and aftercare by all involved disciplines. The first step in treatment of medulloblastoma is a maximal safe surgery, followed by thorough staging. Surgery should only be performed in experienced neurosurgical centers, with age-appropriate postoperative care. As optimal risk stratification is based on histopathological and neuroradiological assessments, these should be performed or confirmed by experienced specialists. Central review of histopathological subtype, as well as review of staging evaluations is highly desirable. For young children with desmoplastic/nodular (DMB), or extensive nodular medulloblastoma, craniospinal or any radiotherapy should be avoided. For young children with classic medulloblastoma (CMB), large cell, or anaplastic medulloblastoma (LC/A MB) optimized strategies with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue with or without local radiotherapy are under investigation. For older clinical standard risk patients (without metastases, without postoperative residual tumor >1.5 cm(2)) with CMB or DMB, craniospinal radiotherapy with 23.4 Gy and boost to the posterior fossa to 54 Gy, followed by maintenance chemotherapy can be regarded as a standard therapy besides other currently applied regimen, such as the use of intensified chemotherapy after irradiation. Older children with LC/A MB, metastatic medulloblastoma, and/or large residual tumor can be regarded as high-risk patients and should receive intensified treatment: intensified chemotherapeutic regimen before or after radiotherapy with increased dose (36-Gy CSI normofractionated, or 40-Gy hyperfractionated) is used. For treatment to be effective, quality control of radiotherapy is of high relevance. Information on long-term sequelae is essential and appropriate multidisciplinary follow-up and support, including rehabilitation and help for reintegration, is necessary. Whenever possible, patients should be included in prospective studies, and tumor material should be sampled to facilitate further research on medulloblastoma biology, which will significantly influence the stratification criteria and the introduction of targeted therapies in standard treatment recommendations in the future.

Identifiers

PMID22622599
OpenAlexW3190111804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.